Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add functionality to compare data source releases #377

Open
burrowse opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add functionality to compare data source releases #377

burrowse opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@burrowse
Copy link

burrowse commented Apr 5, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When viewing a data source, its difficult to quickly determine what has changed.

Describe the solution you'd like
Potentially, the Achilles output could be leveraged to show differences in counts (persons, records), data quality issues between two versions within a data source

Describe alternatives you've considered
Currently, this requires opening two tabs of ARES and eyeballing the various reports and graphs.

@fdefalco
Copy link
Contributor

fdefalco commented Apr 8, 2024

This feature exists in the domain reports by displaying the 'delta' columns. The delta columns show the difference from the prior release. A recent bug has caused some issues with this display with the latest releases, however we're pushing a fix for that issue.

image

@burrowse
Copy link
Author

burrowse commented Apr 9, 2024

@fdefalco That domain level delta is really helpful! In addition to such, would we be able to pull the comparison up a level for example a delta of persons and records in each CDM table in one report? I'm thinking a report like that could help us to identify major issues with tables/domains quickly e.g a 25% drop/increase in condition_occurrence records that would then prompt us to take a closer look at the condition domain report for exact details.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants