Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failure to initialize Gas-Water Model #5039

Open
mbmfer opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Failure to initialize Gas-Water Model #5039

mbmfer opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@mbmfer
Copy link

mbmfer commented Dec 5, 2023

Hi, I'm getting a phaseIsActive(phaseIdx) failed error when initializing a Gas-Water Model:

PhaseIsActive

I'm using GAS and WATER in the RUNSPEC section, rel-perms using WSF and GSF and PVT using PVTW and PVDG.

I'm running it with flow 2023.04.

Do I need to define an equivalent keyword to RVCONST?.

Thanks a lot and kind regards,

Mariano Fernandez

@totto82
Copy link
Member

totto82 commented Dec 15, 2023

Do I need to define an equivalent keyword to RVCONST?.

No.

Do you have a small test case that reproduce the failure that you can share?

@mbmfer
Copy link
Author

mbmfer commented Dec 15, 2023

INCLUDE.zip

Dear Harald,

Thanks a lot for your reply. Please find the model deck attached. I had to re-create the deck in windows to be able to share it. The original model is in a virtual Ubuntu machine. Apologies if there are typos.
All files except the .DATA file need to be in an INCLUDE folder.

Kind regards and thanks a lot in advance,

Mariano Fernandez

P.D: Today tuesday 19/12 I replaced the big model with a simple one showing the same error

@totto82
Copy link
Member

totto82 commented Dec 20, 2023

Thanks for the case. It seems ROCKCOMP is not support for gas-water cases. I have localized the bug in the code, and can provide a fix tomorrow.

@totto82
Copy link
Member

totto82 commented Dec 21, 2023

#5081

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants