Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Run command #83

Open
Owez opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Run command #83

Owez opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request future Backburner issue which is for versions in the future

Comments

@Owez
Copy link
Owner

Owez commented Jan 12, 2023 •
edited

I've had an idea to completely automate the operation of Yark:

$ yark run [archive]

If this command is implemented, calling it would allow you to:

  1. Run the minuteman (see Minuteman command #82) command to archive videos right at the point of upload
  2. Run a scheduled (see Scheduling #12) archive refresh to maintain the complete archive
  3. Run the viewer

This essentially usurps the role of archive maintenence from the refresh command because it runs the refresh as well as the new possible minuteman command, creating a "perfect" archive. All the other commands are the building blocks to this one.
@Owez Owez added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 12, 2023
@Owez Owez mentioned this issue Jan 12, 2023
Open
@Owez
Copy link
Owner Author

Owez commented Jan 12, 2023

Blocked by #82 and #12, this is a big future concept and won't be released for a while

@Owez Owez added the future Backburner issue which is for versions in the future label Jan 18, 2023
@Owez Owez mentioned this issue Jan 22, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request future Backburner issue which is for versions in the future
Projects
No open projects
Yark 1.4
Status: Todo
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Owez