Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Perfect foresight incompatible with transmission losses #963

Open
FabianHofmann opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Perfect foresight incompatible with transmission losses #963

FabianHofmann opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug

Comments

@FabianHofmann
Copy link
Contributor

Atm the perfect foresight code is not compatible with the reversed column in n.links. The easiest solution would actually be to support the reversed column in pypsa itself. Otherwise, the default is nan which infers with consistent dtype assignment expected by the IO.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@FabianHofmann