You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think adding the unitary group U(n) and special unitary SU(n) would be interesting as they are 'bigger' than O(n) and SO(n) (and also connected which might be interesting), and many physical models are invariant under the unitary group. I'm uncertain if it would necessitate adding support for complex numbers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think at this point, escnn is focused on all subgroups of the Euclidean group E(n), so adding support for unitary groups might be a heavy lift. Perhaps one can develop uscnn for that matter :)
I think adding the unitary group U(n) and special unitary SU(n) would be interesting as they are 'bigger' than O(n) and SO(n) (and also connected which might be interesting), and many physical models are invariant under the unitary group. I'm uncertain if it would necessitate adding support for complex numbers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: