Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add copy_backward and move_backward #1207

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

hkaiser
Copy link
Member

@hkaiser hkaiser commented Jul 30, 2014

This pull request also simplifies test::decorated_iterator

@hkaiser hkaiser added this to the 0.9.9 milestone Jul 30, 2014
@hkaiser hkaiser self-assigned this Jul 30, 2014
@hkaiser
Copy link
Member Author

hkaiser commented Jul 30, 2014

After thinking about this a bit more I realized that the only valid use case for copy_backward and move_backward is to handle overlapping source and destination ranges. However for parallel algorithms we have no guarantee in what sequence the elements are handled. Thus these two algorithms are useless (and there is a reason why these two are not part of N4071). Closing this without merging...

@hkaiser hkaiser closed this Jul 30, 2014
@StellarBot
Copy link

Test Failed.
Refer to this link for build results: http://hermione.cct.lsu.edu:5632/job/hpx_pr_debug_gcc_48_boost_1_55_0/69/

@StellarBot
Copy link

Test Passed.
Refer to this link for build results: http://hermione.cct.lsu.edu:5632/job/hpx_pr_debug_gcc_46_boost_1_55_0/79/

@StellarBot
Copy link

Test Failed.
Refer to this link for build results: http://hermione.cct.lsu.edu:5632/job/hpx_pr_debug_gcc_44_boost_1_55_0/99/

@StellarBot
Copy link

Test Failed.
Refer to this link for build results: http://hermione.cct.lsu.edu:5632/job/hpx_pr_debug_gcc_47_boost_1_55_0/68/

@hkaiser hkaiser deleted the copy_move_backward branch August 2, 2014 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants