Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Making sure for_loop_n(par, ...) is actually executed in parallel #2612

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 7, 2017
Merged

Making sure for_loop_n(par, ...) is actually executed in parallel #2612

merged 1 commit into from May 7, 2017

Conversation

hkaiser
Copy link
Member

@hkaiser hkaiser commented May 7, 2017

No description provided.

@hkaiser hkaiser added this to the 1.1.0 milestone May 7, 2017
biddisco
biddisco approved these changes May 7, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@biddisco biddisco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@biddisco biddisco merged commit 272f06b into master May 7, 2017
@hkaiser hkaiser deleted the fix_for_loop_n branch May 7, 2017 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@biddisco biddisco biddisco approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
category: algorithms type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.1.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@hkaiser @biddisco