Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lyapunov example won't run, incremental compile problem during package installation? #85

Open
tjr1 opened this issue Aug 4, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@tjr1
Copy link

tjr1 commented Aug 4, 2023

Hi. First, thanks for developing FractionalDiffEq. It is awesome. I'm trying to use it for a research project.

Issue: When I try to run the Lyapunov exponent example https://scifracx.org/FractionalDiffEq.jl/dev/flyapunovexp/ , I get an error: "MethodError: no method matching" for FOLyapunov()

Initially, I was running it in JuliaHub with Julia 1.8.5, then I tried it locally on my mac with Julia 1.9.1.

Maybe related:
I noticed when I installed the FractionalDiffEq package locally, that it gave warnings about FOLyapunov() and a number of other functions: "** incremental compilation may be fatally broken for this module **"

Did some google searches and found that this has popped up variously for others:
https://discourse.julialang.org/t/random-warning-messages-with-catalyst/66289/3
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70437015/cant-add-differentialequation-jl-to-julia-1-7-0
Maybe the new manifest features from 1.7 are causing probems. Would an older version of Julia solve this? Like 1.6 or something?

Wondering if you've seen this and what you might suggest.

Gratefully,
Tom

@tjr1
Copy link
Author

tjr1 commented Aug 6, 2023

I tested it out on Julia 1.6.7, the LTS version, and it worked perfectly. So I'm guessing this is an issuing with >= Julia 1.7. Should we close the issue then?

@ErikQQY
Copy link
Member

ErikQQY commented Aug 7, 2023

Sorry for the errors and late response, FractionalDiffEq.jl is undergoing an extensive overhaul, so some features may be broken, it is great you figured out the problem. I think we can keep this issue open until all things are done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants