You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The composer loader (at least the version that is being benchmarked) remembers if a class does not exist, and skips the lengthy operations next time.
This is nice, but I wonder if it is intended for the benchmark?
Composer gets very attractive numbers in the last benchmark (fail 500 classes), and mostly this is because of the repetition.
Intended or not?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it should be taken into account because it can happen that hot code does check for a class's presence, and it would suck if the autoloader can't handle it gracefully. That said it might be better to have two tests, one with 500 random (unique) class names, and one with 500 times the same.
The composer loader (at least the version that is being benchmarked) remembers if a class does not exist, and skips the lengthy operations next time.
This is nice, but I wonder if it is intended for the benchmark?
Composer gets very attractive numbers in the last benchmark (fail 500 classes), and mostly this is because of the repetition.
Intended or not?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: