You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For me it seems to be a very usual thing to add a new action because this new action actually needs to be done before another already existing action. As an example, I might have the action "conceive a child" and after a while I come to the conclusion that this action depends on a new (to be created) action "find a woman". Currently it seems to be impossible to "spawn" new actions based on existing ones. However, it is possible to create new actions that depend on existing actions very easily.
I just saw that my "actions" are not really actionable in the sense that some prerequisites are missing and I should have thought about the whole process earlier. I might be approaching this from the wrong direction. However, I think that not everything you note using GTD is supposed to be worked out like that - I even think that adding intermediate steps is very common.
Originally reported by carsten.otto on May 5, 2013 at 15:08:38 (-0400) against version 2.2.2.git-master
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Migrated from the original issue at https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/1426
Based on my mail to the mailing list/group: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/tracksapp/eIeIj3lWBCk
For me it seems to be a very usual thing to add a new action because this new action actually needs to be done before another already existing action. As an example, I might have the action "conceive a child" and after a while I come to the conclusion that this action depends on a new (to be created) action "find a woman". Currently it seems to be impossible to "spawn" new actions based on existing ones. However, it is possible to create new actions that depend on existing actions very easily.
I just saw that my "actions" are not really actionable in the sense that some prerequisites are missing and I should have thought about the whole process earlier. I might be approaching this from the wrong direction. However, I think that not everything you note using GTD is supposed to be worked out like that - I even think that adding intermediate steps is very common.
Originally reported by carsten.otto on May 5, 2013 at 15:08:38 (-0400) against version 2.2.2.git-master
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: