Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Underestimation by a factor of 2 #9

Open
jaluebbe opened this issue Jan 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Underestimation by a factor of 2 #9

jaluebbe opened this issue Jan 1, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@jaluebbe
Copy link

jaluebbe commented Jan 1, 2024

I tried to adapt the example panel_class.ipynb to a typical solar panel and its mounting position. My impression is that I have to multiply all estimated results for the panel power by two to fit to the measured results.

@aqreed
Copy link
Owner

aqreed commented Jan 3, 2024

Thanks i ll look into it. Could you give more info?

@jaluebbe
Copy link
Author

jaluebbe commented Jan 3, 2024

Thanks for the quick response. I'll give you some data to my setup and location:
110W@1000W/m2 panel:
s = 0.514 # m2
eff = 0.22
lat = 52.5
lon = 7.3
height = 30 # m above sea level
panel surface is looking south, 90deg angle to ground.
date: 2023-12-26
solarpy calculation shows about 42W at 12:00
my data shows a peak of 85W at 12:00

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants