Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RF links that should be usable stuck in idle status? #998

Open
1 task
km6lslf opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 9 comments
Open
1 task

RF links that should be usable stuck in idle status? #998

km6lslf opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 9 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@km6lslf
Copy link

km6lslf commented Dec 7, 2023

KA6TCR-TCR-DPNIC-23 WiFi scan.pdf

Describe the bug

RF links on a Rocket 5AC Lite are stuck in idle status and never seem to be added to a routing table.

  • Does this issue still occur on the latest version? (Required)
    Started on recent nightly before 3.23.12.0 and persists with the latest stable release installed.

Expected behavior

Successful RF connections when SNR is above thresholds set in LQM and signals are seen on WiFi Scan.

Screenshots

Please include a screenshot of your system information (if possible) if the specific system environment is relevant to the bug.
WiFi Scan, Mesh Status and Neighbor Status pages are
KA6TCR-TCR-DPNIC-23 Neighbor Status.pdf
attached in PDF form.
KA6TCR-TCR-DPNIC-23 mesh status.pdf

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

@km6lslf km6lslf added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 7, 2023
@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Dec 7, 2023

From the information provided, this looks correct. The RF links dont appear to be good enough quality (I dont see them on the Mesh page and the Neigbor page has failed to resolve their names) so the routing algorithm is sending everything via the DtD link ... which is what you'd expect it to do.

Would you expect these RF links to be usable?

@km6lslf
Copy link
Author

km6lslf commented Dec 7, 2023

They don't show up on the mesh page, which I believe is a symptom of the problem of their status being idle. In my experience, an SNR of 19 is definitely usable and an SNR of 14 is generally useful for low-bandwidth activities. The node ending in 226 is Krum, which reported a 100% LQ from KA6TCR-TCR-DPNIC-23. The node ending in 173 is on the roof of my house and reports a 89% LQ. These suggest to me that these links should be usable.

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Dec 7, 2023

The mesh page would show the link regardless of idle status - the fact that it's not routing traffic there doesnt effect OLSR which provides that data - rather the opposite really. What do the other radios think regarding the connection to this node?

@km6lslf
Copy link
Author

km6lslf commented Dec 7, 2023

They show the LQ values described above and NLQ of 0. If you're looking for other information please let me know how to find the information you're looking for.

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Dec 7, 2023

And the neighbor page information?

@km6lslf
Copy link
Author

km6lslf commented Dec 7, 2023

Based on your information saying it was sending info to the DtD connection, I added a tunnel connection to my house to the hAP that KA6TCR-TCR-DPNIC-23 is connected to. I now get the following information:

KA6TCR-TCR-DPNIC-23 WiFi Scan:

SNR | Signal | Chan | Enc | SSID | Hostname | MAC/BSSID | 802.11 Mode -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- 27 | -82 | 131 |   | AREDN-10-v3 | - | 44:D9:E7:6A:8B:FB | Connected Ad-Hoc Station 27 | -82 | 131 |   | AREDN-10-v3 | KA6TCR-RM5120-KRUM-226 | 24:A4:3C:FC:CA:E2 | Connected Ad-Hoc Station 21 | -88 | 131 |   | AREDN-10-v3 | KM6SLF-NSM5-NORTH-173 | F4:92:BF:48:B6:AD | Connected Ad-Hoc Station

Neighbor Status:
NeighborLinkSNRDistanceQualityStatus
ka6tcr-hap-dpnic-208DtD-0.0 miles100%active
ka6tcr-rm5120-krum-226RF19/124.1 miles92%idle
km6slf-nsm5-north-173RF13/93.3 miles60%idle
44:D9:E7:6A:8B:FBRF20-100%idle

It's now seeing Krum on the Mesh Status screen, but with 0 LQ and 94 NLQ. Still not seeing km6slf-nsm5-north-173

@km6lslf
Copy link
Author

km6lslf commented Dec 7, 2023

Would it not be seeing km6slf-nsm5-north-173 because it's on the remote node list due to the tunnel connection?

@km6lslf
Copy link
Author

km6lslf commented Dec 7, 2023

Krum mesh status showing DPNIC-23
image

And DPNIC-23 mesh status showing Krum.
image

@km6lslf
Copy link
Author

km6lslf commented Dec 7, 2023

Here's the Neighbor status of the DPNIC-23 node:
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants