Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using venv instead of virtualenv #126

Open
RaddishIoW opened this issue Jan 27, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Consider using venv instead of virtualenv #126

RaddishIoW opened this issue Jan 27, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@RaddishIoW
Copy link

Python includes a virtual environment package as part of the base installation - "venv".

Ideally, I do not want to install virtualenv as I do not use it for any other purpose, preferring to use the built-in venv package.

Would it be a good idea to allow the use of venv to install and use EBCLI instead of requiring a 3rd party package?

@Suncatcher
Copy link

Agree. It makes no sense to use deprecated tool like virtualenv. Venv is a stanard and has the same capabilities, the only reason people use virtualenv is backward compatibility with Python2.

@kaijuh
Copy link

kaijuh commented Sep 19, 2022

I second this. I came here hoping this was a planned update

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants