Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Alloy and/or Liquid Haskell #17

Open
dalaing opened this issue May 7, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Alloy and/or Liquid Haskell #17

dalaing opened this issue May 7, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
@dalaing
Labels
needs scheduling

Comments

@dalaing
Copy link
Member

dalaing commented May 7, 2015

These are both lightweight formal methods backed by SAT/SMT solvers that seem pretty approachable. Alloy seems more useful for initial planning and prototyping, while LiquidHaskell seems more useful for making sure that your implementation behaves according to the spec/refinements.

I'll need a bit of time to play around with both of these, but will be keen to talk about them once I have.
@frasertweedale
Copy link
Member

I'm still interested to hear about LH if someone can present? Otherwise we should probably close this due to old age.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dalaing dalaing

Labels
needs scheduling
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@benkolera @dalaing @frasertweedale