-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
hammer: osd: crash on EIO during deep-scrubbing #11935
Conversation
This patch is inspired by fabd635 but is not a cherry-pick. Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16870 Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
@athanatos Please review my attempt to implement your instruction from http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16870#note-2 |
lgtm |
…bbing Reviewed-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
…bbing Reviewed-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
@athanatos This backport passed a rados suite at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-7 with failures that I believe have been addressed (except for http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15139 which is caused by the build system no longer providing dumpling-era packages). I have rebuilt the integration branch to include the two fixes and scheduled a new run at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-14 Do you think it's OK to merge provided the second run succeeds? |
…bbing Reviewed-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
…bbing Reviewed-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
Second run succeeded; third run here: http://pulpito.front.sepia.ceph.com/smithfarm-2016-11-21_11:52:41-rados-hammer-backports---basic-smithi/ |
lgtm |
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16870