CRAB: update crab-prod to v3.211130 #7484
Conversation
|
please test |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ddaina (Daina) for branch IB/CMSSW_12_2_X/master. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @iarspider, @ddaina can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
| @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ echo dbs >> %{i}/etc/crab_py_pkgs.txt | |||
| echo RestClient >> %{i}/etc/crab_py_pkgs.txt | |||
|
|
|||
| #Copy WMCore | |||
| if [ "%{crab_type}" != "dev" ] ; then | |||
| if [ "%{crab_type}" == "pre" ] ; then | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ddaina , is this what you want? pre will use WMCore and prod and dev will use CRABClient/WMCoreConfiguration.py ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, that's what we want. We use pre as previous so users can fall back to it in case of problems when we move from dev to prod. We do not have means to do a menaingful validation in "preprod" after we do our best in dev which in this case includes having CMSSW_12 users use it !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
my bad, I thought pre stands for for pre-production/pre-release :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no reason to feel bad. It was a dirty expedient I dreamed off. And not standard in any way. Yes, it is a devious use of the pre prefix , sorry about that. Did not want to ask you to introduce a crab-old
|
+externals |
cmsbuild
added
externals-approved
fully-signed
and removed
externals-pending
pending-signatures
labels
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_12_2_X/master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-79668a/20908/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
fyi @belforte