Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make lhapdf6 inactive and remove library renaming #851

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2014

Conversation

mkirsano
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mkirsano
Copy link
Contributor Author

To be checked that generators use lhapdf, not lhapdf6 (although it worked like this with rivet2)

@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ Source3: http://www.hepforge.org/archive/lhapdf/pdfsets/6.1/CT10.tar.gz
Source4: http://www.hepforge.org/archive/lhapdf/pdfsets/6.1/MSTW2008nlo68cl.tar.gz

Requires: boost yaml-cpp python cython
BuildRequires: autotools
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did you remove autotools?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed autotools because they are not used in the build and also because after the upgrade of autotools in cmsdist in June I don't manage to build anything depending on it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, but why did you need it in the first place?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Historical: it is used for lhapdf 5 series, came from there

ktf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2014
Make lhapdf6 inactive and remove library renaming
@ktf ktf merged commit b5a6425 into cms-sw:IB/CMSSW_7_2_X/stable Jul 16, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants