Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleaning of test workflows in PyReleaseValidation #25981

Closed
fabiocos opened this issue Feb 20, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Cleaning of test workflows in PyReleaseValidation #25981

fabiocos opened this issue Feb 20, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

During the last update of relval input files a set of some 55 inputs were missing, and during the discussion with PdmV they were mentioned as potentially obsolete and not needed. In order to keep the IB functional they have been reproduced, but this triggers the question whether a review of the present set is needed, and some of these samples can be just dropped.

As of 2019-02-20 there are still two workflows failing in 10_5_X: 10826.0 and 250204.18 .
Furthermore, in 10_2_X there are still 10 failing workflows due to missing input properly defined: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/html/cmssdt-ib/#/relVal/CMSSW_10_2/2019-02-19-1100?selectedArchs=slc6_amd64_gcc700&selectedFlavors=X&selectedStatus=failed which should be fixed as well.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Issue was created by @fabiocos Fabio Cossutti.

@davidlange6, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

assign pdmv

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: pdmv

@prebello,@zhenhu,@pgunnell you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@prebello @zhenhu on the short term we should try to fix the residual failures (most of those in master are gone, are the two remaining samples being produced? And what about the 10_2_X?).
Then it would be useful to start list what you considered obsolete

@zhenhu
Copy link
Contributor

zhenhu commented Feb 21, 2019

Hi @fabiocos , the residual failures will be fixed by #25955

@zhenhu
Copy link
Contributor

zhenhu commented Feb 22, 2019

Hi @fabiocos , the failures in 10_2_X fastsim will be fixed by #25998

@fabiocos fabiocos closed this as completed Apr 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants