Circular dependencies in DataFormats #31019

davidlange6 · 2020-08-02T07:34:34Z

From pr #31005 by adding the dependencies needed according to #includes, scram finds a number of circular dependencies. @Dr15Jones has fixed one. Here are some others... I inlined what I learned before stopping..

gmake: Circular lib/slc7_amd64_gcc820/DataFormatsSiPixelDetId_xr_rdict.pcm <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/SiPixelDetId/src/DataFormatsSiPixelDetId/a/DataFormatsSiPixelDetId_xr.cc dependency dropped.

Pixel*Name classes should be moved ?

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/SiStripCluster/src/DataFormatsSiStripCluster/a/DataFormatsSiStripCluster_xr.cc <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/rootpcms/DataFormatsSiStripDetId dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/TrackCandidate/src/DataFormatsTrackCandidate/a/DataFormatsTrackCandidate_xr.cc <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/rootpcms/DataFormatsTrackReco dependency dropped.

This looks simple to fix. Move TrajectoryStopReason

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/TrackerCommon/src/DataFormatsTrackerCommon/libDataFormatsTrackerCommon.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsSiStripCluster dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/TrackCandidate/src/DataFormatsTrackCandidate/libDataFormatsTrackCandidate.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackCandidate dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/HLTReco/src/DataFormatsHLTReco/libDataFormatsHLTReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsEgammaCandidates dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/HLTReco/src/DataFormatsHLTReco/libDataFormatsHLTReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsJetReco dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/METReco/src/DataFormatsMETReco/libDataFormatsMETReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsEgammaReco dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/METReco/src/DataFormatsMETReco/libDataFormatsMETReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsJetReco dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/RecoCandidate/src/DataFormatsRecoCandidate/libDataFormatsRecoCandidate.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsEgammaReco dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/GsfTrackReco/src/DataFormatsGsfTrackReco/libDataFormatsGsfTrackReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackCandidate dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/GsfTrackReco/src/DataFormatsGsfTrackReco/libDataFormatsGsfTrackReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackingRecHit dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/TrajectorySeed/src/DataFormatsTrajectorySeed/libDataFormatsTrajectorySeed.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackingRecHit dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/TrajectorySeed/src/DataFormatsTrajectorySeed/libDataFormatsTrajectorySeed.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libGeometryCommonTopologies dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/RecoCandidate/src/DataFormatsRecoCandidate/libDataFormatsRecoCandidate.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackCandidate dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/RecoCandidate/src/DataFormatsRecoCandidate/libDataFormatsRecoCandidate.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackingRecHit dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/METReco/src/DataFormatsMETReco/libDataFormatsMETReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackCandidate dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/METReco/src/DataFormatsMETReco/libDataFormatsMETReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackingRecHit dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/VertexReco/src/DataFormatsVertexReco/libDataFormatsVertexReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackCandidate dependency dropped
.
gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/VertexReco/src/DataFormatsVertexReco/libDataFormatsVertexReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackingRecHit dependency dropped
.
gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/TauReco/src/DataFormatsTauReco/libDataFormatsTauReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsJetReco dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/TauReco/src/DataFormatsTauReco/libDataFormatsTauReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsParticleFlowCandidate dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/TauReco/src/DataFormatsTauReco/libDataFormatsTauReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackCandidate dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/TauReco/src/DataFormatsTauReco/libDataFormatsTauReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackingRecHit dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/HLTReco/src/DataFormatsHLTReco/libDataFormatsHLTReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackCandidate dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/HLTReco/src/DataFormatsHLTReco/libDataFormatsHLTReco.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsTrackingRecHit dependency dropped.

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/Geometry/CommonTopologies/src/GeometryCommonTopologies/libGeometryCommonTopologies.so <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cache/prod/libDataFormatsJetReco dependency dropped.

cmsbuild · 2020-08-02T07:34:54Z

A new Issue was created by @davidlange6 David Lange.

@Dr15Jones, @dpiparo, @silviodonato, @smuzaffar, @makortel, @qliphy can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

Dr15Jones · 2020-08-02T13:16:43Z

assign reconstruction

cmsbuild · 2020-08-02T13:17:02Z

New categories assigned: reconstruction

@slava77,@perrotta,@jpata you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

slava77 · 2020-08-02T15:47:55Z

the description is pretty unreadable.
Can this be reparsed to something that could be passed to developers? At this point only the first few with explicit comments are only somewhat clear.

davidlange6 · 2020-08-02T15:53:28Z

I fixed up some incorrect line breaks - but right, presumably some digging is needed to know the potential solution to each one. I provided the digging that I have done so far

slava77 · 2020-08-02T16:30:23Z

I fixed up some incorrect line breaks - but right, presumably some digging is needed to know the potential solution to each one. I provided the digging that I have done so far

thanks, this is a bit better already.

Does this provide the same information as in the ignominy (IB QA)?

e.g. https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/newQA.py?arch=slc7_amd64_gcc820&release=CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-07-30-2300

     Cycle 6
        DataFormats/SiPixelDetId
        DataFormats/SiStripCluster
        DataFormats/SiStripDetId
        DataFormats/TrackerCommon

Can ignominy be used to get a more readable/detailed information?

davidlange6 · 2020-08-02T16:36:50Z

On Aug 2, 2020, at 6:30 PM, Slava Krutelyov <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote: Can ignominy be used to get a more readable/detailed information? Indeed it looks like some of these are reported by ignominy as well. Scram seems to have picked up more after BuildFIles that match what’s #included are used. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#31019 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGPFQ47CJZCKY4XFTI7MCTR6WICXANCNFSM4PSNHS3A>.

slava77 · 2020-08-02T16:40:27Z

since the issue is not reported in an obvious way,
how to reproduce the report to see that a specific item is gone?

davidlange6 · 2020-08-02T16:43:20Z

currently one can do git cms-merge-topic 31005 scram b On Aug 2, 2020, at 6:40 PM, Slava Krutelyov <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote: since the issue is not reported in an obvious way, how to reproduce the report to see that a specific item is gone? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#31019 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGPFQ76BKZWVIWOPBXDQP3R6WJIRANCNFSM4PSNHS3A>.

Dr15Jones · 2020-08-02T16:46:34Z

The dependencies appear to be a bit more complex

[root@25fa425c5ca5 CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2]# grep TrackerCommon $CMSSW_RELEASE_BASE/src/DataFormats/SiPixelDetId/*/*
/cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2/src/DataFormats/SiPixelDetId/src/PixelBarrelName.cc:#include "DataFormats/TrackerCommon/interface/TrackerTopology.h"
/cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2/src/DataFormats/SiPixelDetId/src/PixelEndcapName.cc:#include "DataFormats/TrackerCommon/interface/TrackerTopology.h"
[root@25fa425c5ca5 CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2]# grep TrackerCommon $CMSSW_RELEASE_BASE/src/DataFormats/SiStripDetId/*/*
/cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2/src/DataFormats/SiStripDetId/interface/SiStripDetId.h:#include "DataFormats/TrackerCommon/interface/SiStripEnums.h"
/cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2/src/DataFormats/SiStripDetId/interface/StripSubdetector.h:#include "DataFormats/TrackerCommon/interface/SiStripEnums.h"
/cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2/src/DataFormats/SiStripDetId/src/SiStripSubStructure.cc:#include "DataFormats/TrackerCommon/interface/TrackerTopology.h"
[root@25fa425c5ca5 CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2]# grep SiStripDetId $CMSSW_RELEASE_BASE/src/DataFormats/TrackerCommon/*/*
[root@25fa425c5ca5 CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2]# grep SiPixelDetId $CMSSW_RELEASE_BASE/src/DataFormats/TrackerCommon/*/*
/cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2/src/DataFormats/TrackerCommon/interface/ClusterSummary.h:#include "DataFormats/SiPixelDetId/interface/PixelSubdetector.h"
/cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2/src/DataFormats/TrackerCommon/interface/ClusterSummary.h:#include "DataFormats/SiPixelDetId/interface/PixelBarrelName.h"
/cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2/src/DataFormats/TrackerCommon/interface/TrackerTopology.h:#include "DataFormats/SiPixelDetId/interface/PixelSubdetector.h"
/cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_2_0_pre2/src/DataFormats/TrackerCommon/src/TrackerTopology.cc:#include "DataFormats/SiPixelDetId/interface/PixelSubdetector.h"

davidlange6 · 2020-08-02T16:46:37Z

Or probably Doing grep PackageA PackageB/BuildFile.xml PackageB/interface/* PackageB/src/* And vice versa is sufficient for most I suspect.. On Aug 2, 2020, at 6:43 PM, David Lange <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote: currently one can do git cms-merge-topic 31005 scram b On Aug 2, 2020, at 6:40 PM, Slava Krutelyov <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com><mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote: since the issue is not reported in an obvious way, how to reproduce the report to see that a specific item is gone? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#31019 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGPFQ76BKZWVIWOPBXDQP3R6WJIRANCNFSM4PSNHS3A>. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#31019 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGPFQZ7XATBQIGKYXKLLCTR6WJTJANCNFSM4PSNHS3A>.

makortel · 2020-08-03T14:58:13Z

gmake: Circular tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/src/DataFormats/TrackCandidate/src/DataFormatsTrackCandidate/a/DataFormatsTrackCandidate_xr.cc <- tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc820/rootpcms/DataFormatsTrackReco dependency dropped.

This looks simple to fix. Move TrajectoryStopReason

Took a look because of personal history. Seems to me that the only reason DataFormats/TrackCandidate is used in DataFormats/TrackReco is for dictionary declarations

cmssw/DataFormats/TrackReco/src/classes_def.xml

Lines 476 to 479 in e1d7658

    
           <class name="std::pair<TrackCandidate,std::pair<reco::Track,reco::Track> >" /> 
        
           <class name="edm::Wrapper<std::pair<TrackCandidate,std::pair<reco::Track,reco::Track> > >" /> 
        
           <class name="std::vector<std::pair<TrackCandidate,std::pair<reco::Track,reco::Track> > >"/> 
        
           <class name="edm::Wrapper<std::vector<std::pair<TrackCandidate,std::pair<reco::Track,reco::Track> > > >"/>

cmssw/DataFormats/TrackReco/src/classes_def.xml

Lines 483 to 486 in e1d7658

    
           <class name="std::pair<TrackCandidate,std::pair<edm::Ref<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track> >,edm::Ref<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track> > > >" /> 
        
           <class name="edm::Wrapper<std::pair<TrackCandidate,std::pair<edm::Ref<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track> >,edm::Ref<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track> > > > >" /> 
        
           <class name="std::vector<std::pair<TrackCandidate,std::pair<edm::Ref<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track> >,edm::Ref<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track> > > > >"/> 
        
           <class name="edm::Wrapper<std::vector<std::pair<TrackCandidate,std::pair<edm::Ref<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track> >,edm::Ref<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<std::vector<reco::Track>,reco::Track> > > > > >"/>

so an alternative could be to move those instead. On the other hand TrackReco has more dependencies than TrackCandidate, which would favor moving TrajectoryStopReason.h.

davidlange6 · 2020-09-03T09:39:00Z

I've fixed the TrackReco/Candidate item.

slava77 · 2020-09-05T01:43:22Z

@davidlange6
can I conclude based on the ignominy report https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/newQA.py?arch=slc7_amd64_gcc820&release=CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-04-2300
that we are done and this issue can be closed?
Or do you see some more issue detected by some other way?

davidlange6 · 2020-09-05T06:28:47Z

Apparently one needs a full build to get a reliable report. I know of at least one more (which is typically reported in the IB q/a information) On Sep 5, 2020, at 3:43 AM, Slava Krutelyov <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote: @davidlange6<https://github.com/davidlange6> can I conclude based on the ignominy report https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/newQA.py?arch=slc7_amd64_gcc820&release=CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-04-2300 that we are done and this issue can be closed? Or do you see some more issue detected by some other way? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#31019 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGPFQ5CM4UQQEWRFU5B4HTSEGJUPANCNFSM4PSNHS3A>.

slava77 · 2020-09-05T15:21:46Z

Apparently one needs a full build to get a reliable report. I know of at least one more (which is typically reported in the IB q/a information)

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/newQA.py?arch=slc7_amd64_gcc10&release=CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-04-2300
from a gcc10 full build
indeed, we still have plenty (4?) cycles with DataFormats included.

davidlange6 · 2020-09-05T15:58:50Z

Cycle 7 is not one I’ve seen before (Eg I didn’t notice it on Thursday). Any recent PR? On 5 Sep 2020, at 17:22, Slava Krutelyov <notifications@github.com> wrote: Apparently one needs a full build to get a reliable report. I know of at least one more (which is typically reported in the IB q/a information) https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/newQA.py?arch=slc7_amd64_gcc10&release=CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-04-2300 from a gcc10 full build indeed, we still have plenty (4?) cycles with DataFormats included. [Screen Shot 2020-09-05 at 8 20 14 AM]<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4676718/92308176-ac93a200-ef50-11ea-9625-2129285e09a3.png> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#31019 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGPFQ5WN7NXH6TGOHSEGCLSEJJRPANCNFSM4PSNHS3A>.

slava77 · 2020-09-05T16:08:40Z

Cycle 7 is not one I’ve seen before (Eg I didn’t notice it on Thursday). Any recent PR?

I think it's already in CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-30-0000
slc7_amd64_gcc820
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/newQA.py?arch=slc7_amd64_gcc820&release=CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-30-0000

davidlange6 · 2020-09-05T16:15:31Z

Thx. Probably I was looking at patch builds:( Cheers, David On 5 Sep 2020, at 18:09, Slava Krutelyov <notifications@github.com> wrote: Cycle 7 is not one I’ve seen before (Eg I didn’t notice it on Thursday). Any recent PR? I think it's already in CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-30-0000 slc7_amd64_gcc820 https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/newQA.py?arch=slc7_amd64_gcc820&release=CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-30-0000 [Screen Shot 2020-09-05 at 9 08 06 AM]<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4676718/92309094-57a75a00-ef57-11ea-91c9-b82c4b268c4a.png> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#31019 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGPFQY2QAQQQRY34LCKPALSEJPBJANCNFSM4PSNHS3A>.

Dr15Jones · 2020-09-05T16:25:46Z

I can't find a connection between JetMETCorrections/FFTJetObjects and Geometry/CommonTopologies. I did

> git grep Geometry | grep JetMETCorrections/FFTJetObjects
> git grep JetMETCorrections | grep Geometry/CommonTopologies

I did that in today's master branch.

slava77 · 2020-09-05T20:42:31Z

If this is a package level cycle (not the same include file), here is one example:

CondFormats/Alignment/src/headers.h depends on CondFormats/External/interface/CLHEP.h
- CondFormats/External/interface/FFTJet.h includes JetMETCorrections/FFTJetObjects/interface/FFTJetCorrectorSequence.h
  - JetMETCorrections/FFTJetObjects/interface/FFTJetCorrectionsTypemap.h includes DataFormats/JetReco/interface/JPTJet.h
    - DataFormats/JetReco/interface/JPTJet.h includes DataFormats/TrackReco/interface/Track.h
      - DataFormats/TrackReco/interface/HitPattern.h includes DataFormats/TrackingRecHit/interface/TrackingRecHit.h (also Track.h includes TrackBase.h, which includes HitPattern.h)
        
        DataFormats/TrackingRecHit/interface/TrackingRecHit.h includes Geometry/CommonDetUnit/interface/GeomDet.h = Geometry/CommonTopologies/interface/GeomDet.h
        
        Geometry/CommonTopologies/interface/GeometryAligner.h includes CondFormats/Alignment/interface/Alignments.h

is this a source of the problem?

davidlange6 · 2020-09-06T11:53:15Z

so this step is naively the problem:
"CondFormats/External/interface/FFTJet.h includes JetMETCorrections/FFTJetObjects/interface/FFTJetCorrectorSequence.h"

davidlange6 · 2020-09-06T12:16:53Z

Seems like FFTJet.h should just move to CondFormats/JetMETObjects. Not sure that will fix everything or not.. (JetMETCorrections/FFTJetObjects seems to be combo of condformats and es producers)

davidlange6 · 2020-09-06T12:24:18Z

I proposed it - #31370

slava77 · 2021-02-11T23:51:13Z

from https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/newQA.py?arch=slc7_amd64_gcc900&release=CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-02-11-1100#ignominy

it looks like the cycle was split into two after #31370
Something still remains

makortel · 2021-02-12T01:02:30Z

It seems to me the cycle 4 in #31019 (comment) is at least partially caused by

cmssw/DataFormats/RecoCandidate/interface/TrackAssociation.h

Lines 14 to 19 in 3220826

    
           typedef edm::AssociationMap< 
        
               edm::OneToManyWithQualityGeneric<TrackingParticleCollection, edm::View<reco::Track>, double> > 
        
               SimToRecoCollection; 
        
           typedef edm::AssociationMap< 
        
               edm::OneToManyWithQualityGeneric<edm::View<reco::Track>, TrackingParticleCollection, double> > 
        
               RecoToSimCollection;

This file (and corresponding dictionaries) should be moved to SimDataFormats/TrackingAnalysis that already depends on DataFormats/TrackReco.

perrotta · 2021-07-08T10:26:45Z

It seems to me the cycle 4 in #31019 (comment) is at least partially caused by

cmssw/DataFormats/RecoCandidate/interface/TrackAssociation.h

Lines 14 to 19 in 3220826

typedef edm::AssociationMap<

edm::OneToManyWithQualityGeneric<TrackingParticleCollection, edm::View<reco::Track>, double> >

SimToRecoCollection;

typedef edm::AssociationMap<

edm::OneToManyWithQualityGeneric<edm::View<reco::Track>, TrackingParticleCollection, double> >

RecoToSimCollection;

This file (and corresponding dictionaries) should be moved to SimDataFormats/TrackingAnalysis that already depends on DataFormats/TrackReco.

This was implemented since last April with #33186

@davidlange6 which is the status of those circular dependencies now?

slava77 · 2021-07-08T12:27:18Z

I looked a few IBs back but apparently there is no ignominy results available https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/newQA.py?arch=slc7_amd64_gcc900&release=CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-07-06-0300#ignominy

@smuzaffar is it still produced?

smuzaffar · 2021-07-08T12:36:25Z

@slava77 , as we moved to python based SCRAM so ignominy is not running as it was using SCRAM perl modules. I will see if I can update it to use new scram

slava77 · 2021-07-20T16:43:21Z

@slava77 , as we moved to python based SCRAM so ignominy is not running as it was using SCRAM perl modules. I will see if I can update it to use new scram

@smuzaffar
please let me know if this was checked already, if the ignominy can be expected to run, eventually.

smuzaffar · 2021-07-20T21:22:53Z

I gave it a look and it is not easy to change ignominy. I will try to port it but it is not on a high priorty list

cmsbuild added the pending-assignment label Aug 2, 2020

cmsbuild added pending-signatures reconstruction-pending and removed pending-assignment labels Aug 2, 2020

davidlange6 mentioned this issue Sep 6, 2020

move FFTJet.h header to reduce circular dependencies #31370

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Circular dependencies in DataFormats #31019

Circular dependencies in DataFormats #31019

davidlange6 commented Aug 2, 2020 •

edited

cmsbuild commented Aug 2, 2020

Dr15Jones commented Aug 2, 2020

cmsbuild commented Aug 2, 2020

slava77 commented Aug 2, 2020

davidlange6 commented Aug 2, 2020

slava77 commented Aug 2, 2020

davidlange6 commented Aug 2, 2020 via email

slava77 commented Aug 2, 2020

davidlange6 commented Aug 2, 2020 via email

Dr15Jones commented Aug 2, 2020

davidlange6 commented Aug 2, 2020 via email

makortel commented Aug 3, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 3, 2020

slava77 commented Sep 5, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 5, 2020 via email

slava77 commented Sep 5, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 5, 2020 via email

slava77 commented Sep 5, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 5, 2020 via email

Dr15Jones commented Sep 5, 2020

slava77 commented Sep 5, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 6, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 6, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 6, 2020

slava77 commented Feb 11, 2021

makortel commented Feb 12, 2021 •

edited

perrotta commented Jul 8, 2021

slava77 commented Jul 8, 2021

smuzaffar commented Jul 8, 2021

slava77 commented Jul 20, 2021

smuzaffar commented Jul 20, 2021

Circular dependencies in DataFormats #31019

Circular dependencies in DataFormats #31019

Comments

davidlange6 commented Aug 2, 2020 • edited

cmsbuild commented Aug 2, 2020

Dr15Jones commented Aug 2, 2020

cmsbuild commented Aug 2, 2020

slava77 commented Aug 2, 2020

davidlange6 commented Aug 2, 2020

slava77 commented Aug 2, 2020

davidlange6 commented Aug 2, 2020 via email

slava77 commented Aug 2, 2020

davidlange6 commented Aug 2, 2020 via email

Dr15Jones commented Aug 2, 2020

davidlange6 commented Aug 2, 2020 via email

makortel commented Aug 3, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 3, 2020

slava77 commented Sep 5, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 5, 2020 via email

slava77 commented Sep 5, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 5, 2020 via email

slava77 commented Sep 5, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 5, 2020 via email

Dr15Jones commented Sep 5, 2020

slava77 commented Sep 5, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 6, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 6, 2020

davidlange6 commented Sep 6, 2020

slava77 commented Feb 11, 2021

makortel commented Feb 12, 2021 • edited

perrotta commented Jul 8, 2021

slava77 commented Jul 8, 2021

smuzaffar commented Jul 8, 2021

slava77 commented Jul 20, 2021

smuzaffar commented Jul 20, 2021

davidlange6 commented Aug 2, 2020 •

edited

makortel commented Feb 12, 2021 •

edited