add missing-, inactive-, valid-hits and clusterChargePerCm TkMaps

[rrabadan]

valid, missing and inactive recHit TrackerHistoMaps added.
inclusiveClusterCharge, ClusterChargePerCMfromOrigin and ClusterChargePerCMfromTrack TkHistoMaps also added.
inclusiveClusterCharge and ClusterChargePerCMfromTrack configurable.
SiStripDQM_OfflineTkMap_Template_cfg_DB.py updated to create the corresponding new TkMaps

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @rrabadan (Raul Rabadan) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

add missing-, inactive-, valid-hits and clusterChargePerCm TkMaps

It involves the following packages:

DQM/SiStripMonitorClient
DQM/SiStripMonitorCluster
DQM/SiStripMonitorTrack

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' or '@cmsbuild, please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #12289 was updated. @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please check and sign again.

[deguio]

please test

[deguio]

please submit to 76x and 80x as well.
thanks,
F.

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9573/console

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #12289 was updated. @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please check and sign again.

[deguio]

seems ok to me

[cmsbuild]

-1
Tested at: 96cdec9
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
4.53 step3

runTheMatrix-results/4.53_RunPhoton2012B+RunPhoton2012B+HLTD+RECODreHLT+HARVESTDreHLT/step3_RunPhoton2012B+RunPhoton2012B+HLTD+RECODreHLT+HARVESTDreHLT.log

135.4 step1

runTheMatrix-results/135.4_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS/step1_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS.log

140.53 step2

runTheMatrix-results/140.53_RunHI2011+RunHI2011+RECOHID11+HARVESTDHI/step2_RunHI2011+RunHI2011+RECOHID11+HARVESTDHI.log

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12289/9573/summary.html

[deguio]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9692/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 96cdec9
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12289/9692/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12289/9692/summary.html

The workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1