Removed unneeded const cast from DTTrigGeom

[Dr15Jones]

The problem was flagged by the static analyzer.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

L1Trigger/DTUtilities

@cmsbuild, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

Following commands in first line of a comment are recognized

• +1|approve[d]|sign[ed]: L1/L2's to approve it
• -1|reject[ed]: L1/L2's to reject it
• assign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to request signatures from other categories
• unassign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to remove signatures from other categories
• hold: L1/all L2's/release manager to mark it as on hold
• unhold: L1/user who put this PR on hold
• merge: L1/release managers to merge this request
• [@cmsbuild,] please test: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests
• [@cmsbuild,] please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#<PR>: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests using externals from cmsdist

[Dr15Jones]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9818/console

[mulhearn]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

-1
Tested at: 52f945a
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
5.1 step2

runTheMatrix-results/5.1_TTbar+TTbarFS+HARVESTFS/step2_TTbar+TTbarFS+HARVESTFS.log

9.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/9.0_Higgs200ChargedTaus+Higgs200ChargedTaus+DIGI+RECO+HARVEST/step3_Higgs200ChargedTaus+Higgs200ChargedTaus+DIGI+RECO+HARVEST.log

140.53 step2

runTheMatrix-results/140.53_RunHI2011+RunHI2011+RECOHID11+HARVESTDHI/step2_RunHI2011+RunHI2011+RECOHID11+HARVESTDHI.log

134.911 step3

runTheMatrix-results/134.911_RunSinglePh2015D+RunSinglePh2015D+HLTDR2_25ns+RECODR2_25nsreHLT+HARVESTDR2_25nsreHLT/step3_RunSinglePh2015D+RunSinglePh2015D+HLTDR2_25ns+RECODR2_25nsreHLT+HARVESTDR2_25nsreHLT.log

135.4 step2

runTheMatrix-results/135.4_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS/step2_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS.log

1306.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/1306.0_SingleMuPt1_UP15+SingleMuPt1_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15/step3_SingleMuPt1_UP15+SingleMuPt1_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15.log

25.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/25.0_TTbar+TTbar+DIGI+RECOAlCaCalo+HARVEST+ALCATT/step3_TTbar+TTbar+DIGI+RECOAlCaCalo+HARVEST+ALCATT.log

1000.0 step2

runTheMatrix-results/1000.0_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0+SKIMD+HARVESTDfst2+ALCASPLIT/step2_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0+SKIMD+HARVESTDfst2+ALCASPLIT.log

1001.0 step2

runTheMatrix-results/1001.0_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0EXP+ALCAEXP+ALCAHARVD1+ALCAHARVD2+ALCAHARVD3+ALCAHARVD4/step2_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0EXP+ALCAEXP+ALCAHARVD1+ALCAHARVD2+ALCAHARVD3+ALCAHARVD4.log

1330.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/1330.0_ZMM_13+ZMM_13+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15/step3_ZMM_13+ZMM_13+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15.log

1003.0 step2

runTheMatrix-results/1003.0_RunMinBias2012A+RunMinBias2012A+RECODDQM+HARVESTDDQM/step2_RunMinBias2012A+RunMinBias2012A+RECODDQM+HARVESTDDQM.log

50202.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/50202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50.log

25202.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25.log

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12478/9818/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[Dr15Jones]

the test failures are not from this pull request