Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

FastSim bug fix 8_0_X: fastSim era for Validation sequence, define DQM sequence for FastSim => *run physicsDQM* #13476

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 3, 2016
Merged

FastSim bug fix 8_0_X: fastSim era for Validation sequence, define DQM sequence for FastSim => *run physicsDQM* #13476

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 3, 2016

Conversation

lveldere
Copy link
Contributor

  • apply fastsim mods to Validation sequence via fastSim era
    • define DQM sequence for FastSim
      => physicsDQM is run again in FastSim workflows.

@lveldere
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_8_0_X milestone Feb 25, 2016
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/11522/console
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/11550/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @lveldere for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Applications
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
Configuration/StandardSequences
FastSimulation/Configuration

@civanch, @lveldere, @boudoul, @franzoni, @mdhildreth, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @ssekmen, @srimanob, @hengne, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @makortel, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @matt-komm, @cerati, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 03fb0c2
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13476/11550/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13476/11550/summary.html

@lveldere
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Feb 26, 2016

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #13476 was updated. @civanch, @lveldere, @boudoul, @franzoni, @mdhildreth, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @ssekmen, @srimanob, @hengne, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@lveldere
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/11577/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 2294e13
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13476/11577/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13476/11577/summary.html

@lveldere
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Feb 28, 2016

+1

@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Feb 28, 2016

+1

@lveldere
Copy link
Contributor Author

lveldere commented Mar 3, 2016

@davidlange6

could you merge this one?
thanks

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2016
@davidlange6
Merge pull request #13476 from lveldere/fastsim-dqm
664bad4 
FastSim bug fix 8_0_X: fastSim era for Validation sequence, define DQM sequence for FastSim => *run physicsDQM*
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 664bad4 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_0_X Mar 3, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
comparison-available fastsim-approved operations-pending orp-pending pdmv-approved pending-signatures tests-approved
Projects
None yet
Milestone
CMSSW_8_0_X
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@lveldere @cmsbuild @fabozzi @davidlange6