Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport GEM reco geometry record from 70x #1461

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2013

Conversation

ianna
Copy link
Contributor

@ianna ianna commented Nov 14, 2013

  • Introduce GEMRecoGeometryRcd
  • Metadata for GEM reco geometry payload
  • GEM reco geometry record loader from DB
  • Cleanup spurious includes and commented out code

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @ianna for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Backport GEM reco geometry record from 70x

It involves the following packages:

CondCore/GeometryPlugins
CondTools/Geometry

@ggovi, @cmsbuild, @apfeiffer1, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@davidlange6 you are the release manager for this.

@apfeiffer1
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @davidlange6 can you please take care of it?

@nclopezo
Copy link
Contributor

Request for 6_2_0_SLHC4, tested with
runTheMatrix.py -j 6 -w upgrade -l 3300,3400,4100,4400,4502,4500,5001,15001

nclopezo added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2013
Backport GEM reco geometry record from 70x
@nclopezo nclopezo merged commit 5c59150 into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC Nov 18, 2013
@ianna ianna deleted the gem-db-record branch October 26, 2015 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants