Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timing information in PF #16619

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Nov 23, 2016
Merged

Conversation

cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

As presented in the Reco meeting of 02/11/16 ( https://indico.cern.ch/event/581218/ ), with a few updates: added timeError on PFClusters and time for PU vertices.

DataFormats:
add support for timing in PF objects

  • time() and timeError() added to PFCandidate and PFBlockElement
  • timeError() added to PFCluster (before, it had only time()), and changed doubles to floats

Reco:
minimal implementation of timing in PFCandidates

  • in the pase2_timing era, MIP timing is propagated from the ValueMaps to the charged PFCandidates
  • PFCluster timing is propagated to PFCandidates (for E/gamma candidates, the timing is taken from the seed cluster)

MC Truth information:
add some truth information in AOD formats

  • genParticleProducer saves t0 and xyz0 of the true signal vertex also saved as a global float and a XYZPointF object
  • getPU_times() added to PileupSummaryInfo and filled if the phase2_timing era

Framework:

  • support for modifying VPSets entries in eras

@bendavid @lgray @bachtis

Automatically ported from CMSSW_8_1_X #16450 (original by @gpetruc).

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for CMSSW_9_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/ParticleFlowCandidate
DataFormats/ParticleFlowReco
DataFormats/PatCandidates
FWCore/ParameterSet
PhysicsTools/HepMCCandAlgos
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer
RecoParticleFlow/PFSimProducer
SimDataFormats/PileupSummaryInfo
SimGeneral/MixingModule
SimGeneral/PileupInformation

@smuzaffar, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @mdhildreth, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @gouskos, @rappoccio, @Martin-Grunewald, @mmarionncern, @imarches, @ahinzmann, @acaudron, @lgray, @jdolen, @ferencek, @wmtan, @rafaellopesdesa, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @wddgit, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @mverzett, @cbernet, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder, @bachtis this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Nov 16, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Nov 16, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/16388/console

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Nov 16, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

****ERROR:Unable to run test_template. Template/Function not found.
SCRAM: Template error --> Can't locate object method "command" via package "BuildSystem::Template::Plugins::PluginCore

in the last build was hopefully transient

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Nov 16, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/16413/console

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Nov 18, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

maybe it works this time

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Nov 18, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/16458/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

-1

Tested at: 440627f

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16619/16458/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests

  • Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test testJetMETCorrectionsType1MET had ERRORS

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16619/16458/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • 20034.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D1_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull+DigiFull_2023D1+RecoFullGlobal_2023D1+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D1
  • 21234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D4_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull+DigiFull_2023D4+RecoFullGlobal_2023D4+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D4
  • 23234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D5_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull+DigiFull_2023D5+RecoFullGlobal_2023D5+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D5

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Nov 18, 2016

+1

for #16619 440627f

  • the same as in the original 81X (the same topic branch and commit ID).
  • jenkins tests pass

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Extension to Modifer is acceptable.

@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 263a7e9 into cms-sw:CMSSW_9_0_X Nov 23, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants