Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracker Geometry Error Messages with More Details #18182

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 5, 2017

Conversation

ianna
Copy link
Contributor

@ianna ianna commented Apr 3, 2017

  • Improve error message when TrackerGeometry is asked for non-existent DetId
  • Move a prototype structure from TrackerGeometry to an analyzer where it is used
  • Migrate to multi-threaded analyzers
  • Add test python configuration
  • Add missing direct dependency
  • Remove extra dependency which was already declared to remove a warning

@slava77 - Should there be an Exception thrown? Most of the downstream code does not check DetId validity any more to improve performance. I'd prefer it to crashing. It's your call.

* Move test structure in an analyzer where it is used
* Migrate to multi-threaded analyzer
* Add python configuration for test
* Add missing direct dependency
@ianna
Copy link
Contributor Author

ianna commented Apr 3, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 3, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18880/console Started: 2017/04/03 17:33

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 3, 2017

A new Pull Request was created by @ianna (Ianna Osborne) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/RecoAlgos
FastSimulation/Tracking
Geometry/TrackerGeometryBuilder
RecoTracker/GeometryESProducer
RecoTracker/TkDetLayers

@perrotta, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @lveldere, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @ssekmen, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @rappoccio, @jdolen, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @abbiendi, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @mschrode, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @ahinzmann, @gkasieczka, @jhgoh, @gpetruc, @matt-komm, @ebrondol, @dgulhan, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
@Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Apr 3, 2017

Should there be an Exception thrown? 
Most of the downstream code does not check DetId validity any more to improve performance. 
I'd prefer it to crashing. 
It's your call.

seems OK to throw for the cases here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 3, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 3, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 3, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2017

Pull request #18182 was updated. @perrotta, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @lveldere, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @ssekmen, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor Author

ianna commented Apr 4, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2017

-1

Tested at: 62bc0f0

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18182/18903/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: Build

  • Build:

I found an error when building:

>> Compiling edm plugin /build/cmsbld/jenkins-workarea/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_1_X_2017-04-03-2300/src/DQMServices/Core/test/DQMMonitorUIRootStandaloneExample.cc 
>> Compiling edm plugin /build/cmsbld/jenkins-workarea/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_1_X_2017-04-03-2300/src/DQMServices/Core/test/DQMSourceExampleConfig.cc 
>> Compiling edm plugin /build/cmsbld/jenkins-workarea/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_1_X_2017-04-03-2300/src/DQMServices/Core/test/DQMBackEndInterfaceQTestsExample.cc 
>> Compiling edm plugin /build/cmsbld/jenkins-workarea/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_1_X_2017-04-03-2300/src/DQMServices/Core/test/DQMTestMultiThread.cc 
/build/cmsbld/jenkins-workarea/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_1_X_2017-04-03-2300/src/SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Geometry/src/PrintGeomMatInfo.cc: In member function 'void PrintGeomMatInfo::dumpSummary(std::ostream&)':
/build/cmsbld/jenkins-workarea/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_1_X_2017-04-03-2300/src/SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Geometry/src/PrintGeomMatInfo.cc:174:11: error: 'G4PhysicalVolumeStore' does not name a type
     const G4PhysicalVolumeStore * pvs = G4PhysicalVolumeStore::GetInstance();
           ^
/build/cmsbld/jenkins-workarea/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_1_X_2017-04-03-2300/src/SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Geometry/src/PrintGeomMatInfo.cc:175:50: error: 'pvs' was not declared in this scope
     out << " Number of G4VPhysicalVolume's: " << pvs->size() << std::endl;
                                                  ^


@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2017

Comparison not run due to Build errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor Author

ianna commented Apr 4, 2017

@smuzaffar - is this IB broken?

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Apr 4, 2017

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18912/console Started: 2017/04/04 16:39

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2017

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor Author

ianna commented Apr 4, 2017

+1

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Apr 4, 2017

+1

for #18182 62bc0f0

  • technical changes in the reco packages, affecting only /test files; the upstream geomtery updates are OK
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons show no differences

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants