Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fillDescriptions fix for E/gamma Pixel Matching Modules #18819

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2017

Conversation

Sam-Harper
Copy link
Contributor

Dear All,

With 9_1_0 now parsed in confdb, I have discovered that I set my fillDescriptions incorrectly for two modules. I regret and appologise for this unnecessary work I have caused you all during this busy time.

Specifically I was missing:
EgammaHLTFilteredSuperClusterProducer.cuts
ElectronNHitSeedProducer.superClusters

I have updated my module configs so confdb can properly parse them. At the same time I set them to proper sensible defaults.

Again my deepest appologises for this oversight.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @Sam-Harper for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronAlgos
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronProducers
RecoEgamma/EgammaHLTProducers

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @fwyzard, @Martin-Grunewald, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@HuguesBrun, @lgray, @calderona, @rafaellopesdesa, @battibass this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 17, 2017

@cmsbuild please test

@Sam-Harper
please clarify if any changes are expected in current standard workflows

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 17, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/19950/console Started: 2017/05/18 00:48

defaults.addParameter<double>("dRZMaxLowEtThres",0.09);
defaults.addParameter<std::vector<double> >("dRZMaxLowEtEtaBins",std::vector<double>{1.,1.5});
defaults.addParameter<std::vector<double> >("dRZMaxLowEt",std::vector<double>{0.09,0.09,0.09});
desc.addVPSet("matchingCuts",cutsDesc,std::vector<edm::ParameterSet>{defaults,defaults,defaults});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why defaults 3 times ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are three hits. Realizing now I should have made the first one different but it doesnt matter too much, one can always reset the cuts in confdb. So the default values are not perfectly sensible, if its a problem I can change it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As you prefer.
I'm fine either way.

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

fwyzard commented May 17, 2017

@davidlange6 please pick this up for 9.2.0 (assuming it passes all tests)

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

fwyzard commented May 18, 2017

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18819/19950/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 3362 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 24
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1833901
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 49248
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1784473
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 180
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 98 log files, 14 edm output root files, 24 DQM output files

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77
No changes in reco.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1
All these modules are meant for HLT development, no effect on reco and not even on current HLT paths.
Jenkins shows no differences
No issues after a visual inspection of the code.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants