Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjustment of GTs for internal TSG tests (93X) #19467

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jul 6, 2017

Conversation

Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

@Martin-Grunewald Martin-Grunewald commented Jun 29, 2017

Adjustment of GTs for internal TSG tests (93X)
Based on CMSSW_9_3_X_2017-06-26-2300

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @Martin-Grunewald (Martin Grunewald) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/HLT
HLTrigger/Configuration

@Martin-Grunewald, @silviodonato, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @makortel, @geoff-smith, @jalimena this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 29, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/20974/console Started: 2017/06/29 08:53

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 1ba3f7d

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
0f37c81
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19467/20974/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19467/20974/git-merge-result

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19467/20974/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: AddOn

  • AddOn:

I found errors in the following addon tests:

cmsDriver.py RelVal -s L1REPACK:Full --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_hlt_PRef --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW" --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1T --era Run2_2017 --magField 38T_PostLS1 --eventcontent RAW --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_PRef_DATA.root --filein /store/data/Run2016B/JetHT/RAW/v1/000/272/762/00000/C666CDE2-E013-E611-B15A-02163E011DBE.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Jun 29 09:46:18 2017-date Thu Jun 29 09:39:11 2017 s - exit: 16640
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:PRef,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_data_PRef --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --era Run2_2017 --magField 38T_PostLS1 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_PRef_DATA.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_PRef_DATA_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Jun 29 09:46:18 2017-date Thu Jun 29 09:39:11 2017 s - exit: 16640
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s L1REPACK:Full --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_hlt_PIon --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW" --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1T --era Run2_2017 --magField 38T_PostLS1 --eventcontent RAW --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_PIon_DATA.root --filein /store/data/Run2016B/JetHT/RAW/v1/000/272/762/00000/C666CDE2-E013-E611-B15A-02163E011DBE.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Jun 29 09:49:05 2017-date Thu Jun 29 09:44:07 2017 s - exit: 16640
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:PIon,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_data_PIon --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --era Run2_2017 --magField 38T_PostLS1 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_PIon_DATA.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_PIon_DATA_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Jun 29 09:49:05 2017-date Thu Jun 29 09:44:07 2017 s - exit: 16640
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s L1REPACK:Full --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_hlt_GRun --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW" --eventcontent RAW --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1T --era Run2_2017 --magField 38T_PostLS1 --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_GRun_DATA.root --filein /store/data/Run2016B/JetHT/RAW/v1/000/272/762/00000/C666CDE2-E013-E611-B15A-02163E011DBE.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Jun 29 09:56:29 2017-date Thu Jun 29 09:51:36 2017 s - exit: 16640
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:GRun,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_data_GRun --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --era Run2_2017 --magField 38T_PostLS1 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_GRun_DATA.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_GRun_DATA_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Jun 29 09:56:29 2017-date Thu Jun 29 09:51:36 2017 s - exit: 16640

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
0f37c81
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19467/20974/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19467/20974/git-merge-result

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor Author

@arunhep @franzoni
Is this related to a more recent GT update?

----- Begin Fatal Exception 29-Jun-2017 09:46:11 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'NoRecord' occurred while
   [0] Processing  stream begin Run run: 272762 stream: 3
   [1] Calling method for module ConvertedPhotonProducer/'conversions'
   [2] Using EventSetup component TransientTrackBuilderESProducer/'' to make data TransientTrackBuilder/'TransientTrackBuilder' in record TransientTrackRecord
   [3] Using EventSetup component GlobalTrackingGeometryESProducer/'' to make data GlobalTrackingGeometry/'' in record GlobalTrackingGeometryRecord
   [4] Using EventSetup component GEMGeometryESModule/'' to make data GEMGeometry/'' in record MuonGeometryRecord
   [5] While getting dependent Record from Record MuonGeometryRecord
Exception Message:
No "GEMRecoGeometryRcd" record found in the EventSetup for synchronization value
Run: 272762 LuminosityBlock: 0 Event: 0 Time: 6281711230306763776
 Please add an ESSource or ESProducer that delivers such a record.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #19467 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @silviodonato, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@Martin-Grunewald Martin-Grunewald deleted the autoAdjustment93X branch June 29, 2017 08:21
@Martin-Grunewald Martin-Grunewald restored the autoAdjustment93X branch June 29, 2017 08:55
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19467/20974/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins-workarea/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-19467/20034.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D17_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D17+RecoFullGlobal_2023D17+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D17
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins-workarea/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-19467/20434.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D19_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D19+RecoFullGlobal_2023D19+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D19

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1756063
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 15027
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1740870
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 166
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 90 log files, 14 edm output root files, 22 DQM output files

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 5, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 5, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 5, 2017

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19467/21162/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1785410
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 102
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1785142
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 166
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 90 log files, 14 edm output root files, 22 DQM output files

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Dr15Jones
please sign this PR so that @davidlange6 can integrate
Thanks

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Seems odd that a core signature is needed.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 5, 2017

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

@Dr15Jones - the core sig is from Utilities/ReleaseScripts (which makes sense I think)

'GRun2016' : ( ','.join( [ 'L1Menu_Collisions2016_v9_m2_xml' ,l1tMenuRecord,connectionString,l1tMenuLabel, "2016-10-06 19:36:53.000"] ), ),
'HIon' : ( ','.join( [ 'L1Menu_CollisionsHeavyIons2015_v5_uGT_xml' ,l1tMenuRecord,connectionString,l1tMenuLabel, "2016-03-04 15:00:00.000"] ), ),
'PIon' : ( ','.join( [ 'L1Menu_HeavyIons2016_v3_m2_xml' ,l1tMenuRecord,connectionString,l1tMenuLabel, "2016-11-22 11:11:00.000"] ), ),
'PRef' : ( ','.join( [ 'L1Menu_Collisions2015_5TeV_pp_reference_v5_uGT_v2_mc_xml',l1tMenuRecord,connectionString,l1tMenuLabel, "2016-03-04 15:00:00.000"] ), ),
}

pfRecord = 'GBRDWrapperRcd'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @Martin-Grunewald - so what are these lines doing in the end?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These lines set the L1T menus for the TSG GTs used in our TSG tests (which change more frequently). Eventually when we update the relval2017 menu the L1T menu needs to be in the actual GT key of AlCa's autoCond.py. But this is like this since many years!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not the L1, the GBRWrapper lines..

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are payloads consumed by running HLT but not yet included in the run2_data_relval or run2_data_promptlike GT keys from AlCa, this is still on the to-do list as referred to earlier to
still have RECO+HLT doable.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Martin-Grunewald look at this #19467 (comment) I mentioned that all the new code compliant PF payloads have been included in Prompt like key now.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But I'd like to get this PR integrated now and then make a new PR later when you have added it and made new GTs.
@davidlange6

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@arunhep - can a gt be available today?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@davidlange6 not possible today but we keep note and we will revive the default keys soon.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"soon" can be when? Middle of next week?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@davidlange6 when CTPPS PR #19470 will be merged we can provide the GT. we still prefer to deploy these tags in prompt like GT.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants