Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XeXe collision era and relval workflow (92X) #20760

Merged
merged 13 commits into from Oct 9, 2017

Conversation

mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of #20749 20749
Customizes the pp reconstruction to keep timing in check.
To be used for XeXe data taking on October 12th.
Adds a relVal worklow to test (148)
Supersedes #20714

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 5, 2017

A new Pull Request was created by @mandrenguyen (Matthew Nguyen) for CMSSW_9_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Eras
Configuration/Generator
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
Configuration/StandardSequences
DQMOffline/Configuration
HLTriggerOffline/Common
RecoEcal/Configuration
RecoEgamma/Configuration
RecoEgamma/EgammaPhotonProducers
RecoJets/Configuration
RecoParticleFlow/Configuration
RecoParticleFlow/PFTracking
RecoPixelVertexing/PixelTriplets
RecoTauTag/Configuration
RecoTracker/ConversionSeedGenerators
RecoTracker/IterativeTracking
RecoTracker/TkSeedGenerator
RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions
RecoVertex/AdaptiveVertexFinder
RecoVertex/PrimaryVertexProducer
Validation/Configuration

@perrotta, @prebello, @vazzolini, @dmitrijus, @kmaeshima, @civanch, @perrozzi, @efeyazgan, @kpedro88, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @franzoni, @thuer, @slava77, @mdhildreth, @vanbesien, @govoni, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @TaiSakuma, @felicepantaleo, @jainshilpi, @rappoccio, @argiro, @Martin-Grunewald, @ahinzmann, @threus, @varuns23, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern, @imarches, @makortel, @acaudron, @lgray, @jdolen, @ferencek, @rociovilar, @Sam-Harper, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @jdamgov, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @mschrode, @ebrondol, @mtosi, @dgulhan, @swertz, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @mverzett, @cbernet, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder, @bachtis this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can someone please trigger the tests?

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

makortel commented Oct 6, 2017

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/23487/console Started: 2017/10/06 09:09

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2017

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20760/23487/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 23
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1967273
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 44226
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1922875
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 172
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 94 log files, 9 edm output root files, 23 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2017

@@ -44,5 +44,13 @@

from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_peripheralPbPb_cff import peripheralPbPb
peripheralPbPb.toModify(seedGeneratorFromRegionHitsEDProducer,
doClusterCheck = True, # FIXMETOO
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this doClusterCheck parameter remain inside the ClusterCheckPSet?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed. Didn't see it as that era isn't tested in relval. As discussed with Slava we may merge or remove it soon. Should I push a fix now, or are you still reviewing?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do it now,
I was comparing the 92X and 94X versions of your PR, and this is the only significant difference I spotted.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2017

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/23584/console Started: 2017/10/09 09:44

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

merge

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit b1d3257 into cms-sw:CMSSW_9_2_X Oct 9, 2017
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2017

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20760/23584/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 23
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1967239
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 29345
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1937722
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 172
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 94 log files, 9 edm output root files, 23 DQM output files

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants