Putting final XeXe beamspot smearing parameters into master for future compatibility

[gsfs]

No description provided.

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-21833/2850

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @gsfs for master.

It involves the following packages:

IOMC/EventVertexGenerators

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[civanch]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/25435/console Started: 2018/01/15 10:01

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 1a102e7
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21833/25435/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21833/25435/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-21833/1325.7_TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2467599
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2467429
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 169
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 1.00000000004 KiB( 22 files compared)
• Checked 110 log files, 9 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

[civanch]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

@gsfs were the old parameters already used for official productions? The PR in itself is simple and looks ready to go

[gsfs]

No, the old parameters were never used for official production. That's why we felt it was appropriate to keep the same name and just change the numbers.

[fabiocos]

+1

[fabiocos]

merge