Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HGCal - use calibrated energy for candidates from neutral hadrons #22071

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 6, 2018

Conversation

felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes the energy association to a PFCandidate coming from a neutral hadron.
Previously the non-calibrated energy was used.

@ahinzmann @rovere

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor Author

type bugfix

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @felicepantaleo (Felice Pantaleo) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/PFSimProducer

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @lgray, @seemasharmafnal, @bachtis, @cbernet this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor Author

attaching presentation by Irene Zoi and Andreas Hinzmann showing negligible impact on jet substructure.
NeutralHadronsCalibration.pdf

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Feb 1, 2018

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/25837/console Started: 2018/02/01 14:16

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22071/25837/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-22071/1325.7_TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 972 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2465763
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 169
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2465425
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 169
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.8100000001 KiB( 22 files compared)
  • Checked 110 log files, 9 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Feb 1, 2018

assign upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

New categories assigned: upgrade

@kpedro88 you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Feb 1, 2018

+1

for #22071 93c9c4d

  • the change is as described and affects only RecoParticleFlow/PFSimProducer/plugins/SimPFProducer.cc
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show differences only in 2023 workflows, as expected.

e.g. in 20034 there is a slight shift in neutral hadron momentum (while pf candidate eta is unchanged)
all_oldvsnew_ttbar14tev2023d17wf20034p0c_log10recopfcandidates_particleflow__reco_obj_pt74

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Feb 2, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 2, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Feb 5, 2018

@fabiocos
please clarify if this can be merged soon.
Thank you.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Feb 6, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit c09097a into cms-sw:master Feb 6, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants