HCAL DQM: online config changes for 2018 (10_0_X version of #22109)

[DryRun]

Some basic changes to the configurations for HCAL online DQM: change eras to 2018, remove plan-1-specific things.

This is the 10_0_X version of #22109.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @DryRun (David Yu) for CMSSW_10_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/Integration

@vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @vanbesien can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @threus, @batinkov, @thomreis this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[jfernan2]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/25906/console Started: 2018/02/05 17:01

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 639a058
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22111/25906/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22111/25906/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-22111/1325.7_TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2468773
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2468603
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 169
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.780000000028 KiB( 22 files compared)
• Checked 110 log files, 9 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

[fabiocos]

@dmitrijus @jfernan2 can this be reviewed in time for 10_0_2?

[jfernan2]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

+1