synchronize HLTTrackClusterRemover to the offline version w/ SiStripClusterChargeCut

[mtosi]

synchronize HLTTrackClusterRemover to the offline version w/ SiStripClusterChargeCut

the parameter which handles the switch of this cut (doStripChargeCheck) is set to FALSE as default value
=> this code update should be back-compatible

@perrotta @Martin-Grunewald @cerati @rovere

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mtosi (mia tosi) for CMSSW_7_0_X.

synchronize HLTTrackClusterRemover to the offline version w/ SiStripClusterChargeCut

It involves the following packages:

RecoLocalTracker/SubCollectionProducers

@nclopezo, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @thspeer, @slava77, @Degano can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@gpetruc, @cerati, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2245/3/summary.html

[Martin-Grunewald]

@anton-a, @thspeer, @slava77, can you sign this? It is a HLT plugin so should not affect RECO...

[slava77]

@Degano @nclopezo
Alessandro and David: the jenkins report still doesn't have comparisons here. Why?

[slava77]

ping

@Degano @nclopezo
Alessandro and David: the jenkins report still doesn't have comparisons here. Why?

[nclopezo]

Hi,

I started them again, they should be available later during the afternoon.

[cmsbuild]

+1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2245/16/summary.html

[slava77]

+1

based on 120d227, relying on jenkins report: no diffs in DQM (except for the SET_GLOBAL, which is sick for a different reason)

[slava77]

Giulio,
This one was on the ORP list of requests from HLT for 70X.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_0_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?