Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a flag to prevent storage of LHEXMLStringProduct, update the dump… #24632

Merged

Conversation

efeyazgan
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #22935

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 24, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @efeyazgan (Efe Yazgan) for CMSSW_9_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

GeneratorInterface/LHEInterface

@alberto-sanchez, @cmsbuild, @qliphy, @perrozzi, @efeyazgan can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @agrohsje, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@efeyazgan
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 24, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/30584/console Started: 2018/09/24 18:01

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 2fbbc71

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24632/30584/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: AddOn

  • AddOn:

I found errors in the following addon tests:

cmsDriver.py TTbar_8TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_cfi --conditions auto:run1_mc --fast -n 100 --eventcontent AODSIM,DQM --relval 100000,1000 -s GEN,SIM,RECOBEFMIX,DIGI:pdigi_valid,L1,DIGI2RAW,L1Reco,RECO,EI,VALIDATION --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --datatier GEN-SIM-DIGI-RECO,DQMIO --beamspot Realistic8TeVCollision : FAILED - time: date Mon Sep 24 19:34:04 2018-date Mon Sep 24 19:28:27 2018 s - exit: 35584

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24632/30584/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 27
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2721493
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 104
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2721227
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 162
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Sep 25, 2018

This seems to be a random error? Also appeared here #24585 and seems to disappear after a 2nd try...

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Sep 25, 2018

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 25, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/30598/console Started: 2018/09/25 03:54

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24632/30598/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 27
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2721493
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 103
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2721228
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 162
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0

@efeyazgan
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@efeyazgan @prebello @pgunnell @qliphy the backport should be ok, as the content of the data structure is not modified, just an empty object if filled instead of the large blob of text

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 768f69d into cms-sw:CMSSW_9_4_X Sep 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants