Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update HGCal dEdX weights consistently #25208

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 16, 2018
Merged

Conversation

kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

The dEdX weight vector for HGCal calibrated RecHits is wrapped in a PSet so it can be modified by modifiers and imported consistently into configurations for other modules.

attn: @rovere @nsmith-

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the CMSSW_10_4_X milestone Nov 12, 2018
@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 12, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31604/console Started: 2018/11/12 15:45

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEgamma/EgammaTools
RecoLocalCalo/HGCalRecProducers

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@edjtscott, @vandreev11, @Sam-Harper, @sethzenz, @felicepantaleo, @jainshilpi, @rovere, @lgray, @cseez, @pfs, @varuns23 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25208/31604/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3013827
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3013629
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

+upgrade

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test
(to pick up the new D35 workflow)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 15, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31676/console Started: 2018/11/15 18:46

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@kpedro88 : do I understand correctly that this PR fixes a bug because previously the dedx weights were not imported consistently in the other modules when modified? (And we should see it while testing D35, as you asked right now)

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

@perrotta yes

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25208/31676/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 1073 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3013311
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 58
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3013056
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Bug fix for the Phase 2 scenarios which include HGCal V9: now dedx weights are correctly propagated to all modules which need them
  • Scenarios with the affected Phase 2 scenarios (e.g. TTbar14TeV2023D35 wf27434 in the automatic jenkins tests) are modified accordingly
  • All other workflows stay untouched

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants