-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Phase2-hgx174 Bug fixes #25344
Phase2-hgx174 Bug fixes #25344
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25344/7364 |
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master. It involves the following packages: Geometry/HGCalCommonData @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@bsunanda are the changes in layerClusters understood? |
There were bugs in the earlier code (1) corners of cells are now better done and tested by Alexandros; (2) the neighbor code was not protected about crossing radius limits; (3) the radius as a function of Z is now correctly done (and tested). These are the 3 changes - I am not sure how any of the changes can affect layerClusters - if these functions are used in making layer clusters, the earlier results were wrong. |
@bsunanda: I think it is helpful to have the named constant that you added. Since this PR changed the implicit factor of 1.0 to an explicit 0.5, one could imagine that a future change might alter the factor again, maybe to 0.25. Having the named constant allows a developer to change the factor in one place rather than many places in the code. The name of the constant could reflect its purpose rather than its value, but there's no need to change its name right now. |
+1 |
Hi all, |
@kpedro88 Could you please clear this PR? there is something else which has cropped up and i can investigate that once it is integrated |
+upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
(1) Adds a tolerance for comparison in double
(2) Provides the right dimension for corner edges