-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
print statement fixes and preserve integer division with python3 #26680
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26680/9642
|
A new Pull Request was created by @davidlange6 (David Lange) for master. It involves the following packages: DQMServices/FwkIO @andrius-k, @Dr15Jones, @kmaeshima, @cvuosalo, @schneiml, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU, @civanch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test
… On May 7, 2019, at 11:56 AM, cmsbuild ***@***.***> wrote:
A new Pull Request was created by @davidlange6 (David Lange) for master.
It involves the following packages:
DQMServices/FwkIO
Validation/Geometry
@andrius-k, @Dr15Jones, @kmaeshima, @cvuosalo, @schneiml, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU, @civanch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@barvic, @vargasa, @rishabhCMS, @rovere, @rbartek this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
print("\n*** Error, '%s' not registered as a valid components to monitor." % options.label) | ||
print("Allowed components:", _ALLOWED_LABELS) | ||
print() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This print
is not needed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would say it can be fixed in another round
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this PR doesn't add the printout - it preserves current behavior.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@davidlange6 yes, I agree, if the maintainers want to modify it it can be done in another round, no point in stopping the PR already approved for this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem, I'll remove it in one of my open PRs
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Fixes failing unit test in DEVEL IBs - the Validation/Geometry unit tests will still fail as our root build does not yet have pyroot working with python3.