Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running code-format for reconstruction #26947

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2019

Conversation

cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Applying code-format for CMSSW category reconstruction.
See the build logs here https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/GitHub-refactor-cmssw-module/276//console

cms-bot has successfully run the following:

  • scram build code-checks-all
  • scram build code-format-all
  • scram build

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26947/9998

  • This PR adds an extra 8KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented May 27, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/525/console Started: 2019/05/27 06:12

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for master.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/MuonData
RecoJets/JetAssociationProducers
RecoLocalTracker/SiStripRecHitConverter
RecoTracker/TkMSParametrization
RecoTracker/TkSeedingLayers
RecoVertex/KalmanVertexFit
TrackingTools/GeomPropagators
TrackingTools/TrajectoryParametrization
TrackingTools/TransientTrack
TrackingTools/TransientTrackingRecHit

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@echabert, @TaiSakuma, @felicepantaleo, @yduhm, @rappoccio, @HeinerTholen, @alesaggio, @ahinzmann, @threus, @mmusich, @seemasharmafnal, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @makortel, @smoortga, @acaudron, @jhgoh, @jdolen, @HuguesBrun, @ferencek, @pieterdavid, @abbiendi, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @jdamgov, @bellan, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @mschrode, @ebrondol, @dgulhan, @clelange, @trocino, @battibass, @gbenelli, @calderona, @mverzett, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder, @folguera this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4ddb6b/525/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3209232
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3208897
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

private:
template <class T>
class stats_t
: boost::arithmetic1<
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can certainly be improved: fix it by hand?


if (trackdirection.mag2() <
float(
FLT_MIN)) { // in case of no track hypothesis assume a track from the origin through the center of the strip
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The already seen issue with comment fields in the same line as the code (to be fixed by moving the comment into the previous line)

const TkRadialStripTopology* rtop =
dynamic_cast<const TkRadialStripTopology*>(&stripdet->specificType().specificTopology());
p.pitch_rel_err2 =
(rtop)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was better as it was before the update

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

same question as in #26868: do we want to merge this now, or make the few manual fixes first?

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 28, 2019

* they could either be fixed already here, or after the merge of this PR

Similar comments were made already in a few already merged PRs and there the action for an update was deferred for later.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 92668f9 into master May 28, 2019
@smuzaffar smuzaffar deleted the code-format-reconstruction-2047ba branch May 31, 2019 09:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants