-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Running code-format for reconstruction #26947
Conversation
please test |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26947/9998
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for master. It involves the following packages: DataFormats/MuonData @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
private: | ||
template <class T> | ||
class stats_t | ||
: boost::arithmetic1< |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can certainly be improved: fix it by hand?
|
||
if (trackdirection.mag2() < | ||
float( | ||
FLT_MIN)) { // in case of no track hypothesis assume a track from the origin through the center of the strip |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The already seen issue with comment fields in the same line as the code (to be fixed by moving the comment into the previous line)
const TkRadialStripTopology* rtop = | ||
dynamic_cast<const TkRadialStripTopology*>(&stripdet->specificType().specificTopology()); | ||
p.pitch_rel_err2 = | ||
(rtop) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was better as it was before the update
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
same question as in #26868: do we want to merge this now, or make the few manual fixes first? |
Similar comments were made already in a few already merged PRs and there the action for an update was deferred for later. |
+1 |
Applying code-format for CMSSW category reconstruction.
See the build logs here https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/GitHub-refactor-cmssw-module/276//console
cms-bot has successfully run the following: