-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explicitly removed methods implicitly ignored by compiler in FWCore/Framework #27927
Conversation
…ramework Although we had asked the compiler explicitly to create default versions of functions, it was implicitly deleting them. Now we explicitly request them to be deleted to match what the compiler was doing. This fixes new clang warnings.
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27927/11762
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages: FWCore/Framework @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
@wddgit does this conflict with your changes? |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
@Dr15Jones No conflict with either PR. Only one file (SubProcess.h) is also modified by one of my PRs, PR #26592, but the changed lines in the PRs are separated by multiple lines. The SoATuple PR is no longer necessary after this one, but still seems like an improvement so I will continue with it. |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@smuzaffar why did the bot add requires-external tag to this pull request? |
yes its a bug, as #26592 was tested using this PR that is why bot assumes that both PR require each other. |
+1 |
PR description:
Although we had asked the compiler explicitly to create default versions
of functions, it was implicitly deleting them. Now we explicitly
request them to be deleted to match what the compiler was doing.
This fixes new clang warnings.
PR validation:
Compiled FWCore/Framework under CMSSW_11_0_CLANG_X_2019-09-03-2300. The only remaining clang warnings come from CppUnit external package.