-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(DAQ) Revert to untracked parameters and new configuration #28359
(DAQ) Revert to untracked parameters and new configuration #28359
Conversation
…sn't have any defaults, so it must be present in the configuration in all cases. - add option to enable reading fileBrokerHost from local configuration file (default). Disabling it allows specifying it as parameter. Python snippet will have to enable it to set file broker host - Reordering, renaming some parameters: consistent naming and grouping per function. Nonexisting parameters are no longer allowed.
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28359/12658
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28359/12659
|
A new Pull Request was created by @smorovic (Srecko Morovic) for master. It involves the following packages: EventFilter/Utilities @perrotta, @mommsen, @cmsbuild, @emeschi, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@smorovic
please do NOT do this: parameters without a default will not be written to the fillDescriptions generated cfi file (as the code does not know which value to put). |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
Well, maybe "addUntracked" (or even "add") function without default should then be removed, unless there is use case I don't see. It has now been changed to InValid as default. |
Thanks. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28359/12660
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28359/12661
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@mommsen comments? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Reverting to untracked parameters in EvFDaqDirector as discussed in #28151
Including also these changes:
PR validation:
Tested in DAQ "VM" test cluster with several relevant combinations of parameters. RunBUFU.sh in EventFilter/Utilities/test also runs fine.