Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch payloads of new phase 2 tau ID to GT #31866

Merged

Conversation

swozniewski
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Changes payload labels of the recently added phase 2 tau ID and anti-ele ID such that payloads are loaded via Global Tag.
Builds on top of PR #31470 which is fully signed but not yet merged.
Requires GT 112X_mcRun4_realistic_Candidate_2020_09_17_13_57_14

PR validation:

  • ran miniAOD sequence for phase2 with payloads loaded via the named GT
  • code-checks and format pass
  • unit tests pass
  • limited matrix tests pass all but three. After adding above GT these do not fail due to missing payload anymore but I get an error of category 'DataCorrupt' from SiPixelRecHitConverter for unknown reasons, but does not seem to be related to this PR.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31866/19227

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @swozniewski for master.

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/RecoAlgos
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoTauTag/Configuration
RecoTauTag/RecoTau

@perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @santocch, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @gouskos, @abbiendi, @emilbols, @ahinzmann, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern, @makortel, @smoortga, @jhgoh, @jdolen, @ferencek, @jdamgov, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @mariadalfonso, @clelange, @riga, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @hatakeyamak, @gpetruc, @andrzejnovak this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 20, 2020

Requires GT 112X_mcRun4_realistic_Candidate_2020_09_17_13_57_14

@cms-sw/alca-l2 please clarify on plans for when the GT will be available in the autoCond

Builds on top of PR #31470 which is fully signed but not yet merged.

a rebase is needed now that it's actually merged

@christopheralanwest
Copy link
Contributor

Requires GT 112X_mcRun4_realistic_Candidate_2020_09_17_13_57_14

@cms-sw/alca-l2 please clarify on plans for when the GT will be available in the autoCond

The GT candidate listed above was not built on top of the latest content of the 112X_mcRun4_realistic_Queue. I created a GT 112X_mcRun4_realistic_v4 that remedies this problem. The diff with respect to the candidate consists of tags that are not relevant for this PR:

https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/112X_mcRun4_realistic_Candidate_2020_09_17_13_57_14/112X_mcRun4_realistic_v4

Could you change v3 to v4 here:

https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/AlCa/python/autoCond.py#L84

and include the changes in this PR?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@swozniewski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, I rebased the branch and updated the version in autoCond

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31866/19242

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #31866 was updated. @perrotta, @yuanchao, @slava77, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @jpata, @pohsun can you please check and sign again.

@christopheralanwest
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 20, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 23, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: bd1cc46
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-50b446/10238/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-23-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-50b446/10238/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2544110
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 10
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2544078
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Payloads for Phase2 tau-ID are taken from the GT, as intended
  • Jenkins tests pass and show no differences wrt the baseline

@christopheralanwest
Copy link
Contributor

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Oct 26, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 8e82638 into cms-sw:master Oct 26, 2020
@mbluj mbluj deleted the CMSSW_11_2_X_tau-pog_phase2-ID-to-GT branch October 10, 2023 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants