Run4-hgx277 Adding a new scenario for October 18 TB setup

[bsunanda]

PR description:

Adding a new scenario for October 18 TB setup

PR validation:

Use cfg's in SimG4CMS/HGCalTestBeam/test

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32925/21155

• This PR adds an extra 48KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Geometry/HGCalCommonData/src/HGCalDDDConstants.cc modified in PR(s): Heterogeneous HGCAL RecHit Calibration #32683

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32925/21155/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32925/21155/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32925/21156

• This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Geometry/HGCalCommonData/src/HGCalDDDConstants.cc modified in PR(s): Heterogeneous HGCAL RecHit Calibration #32683

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Geometry/HGCalCommonData
SimDataFormats/CaloTest
SimG4CMS/Calo
SimG4CMS/HGCalTestBeam

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@thomreis, @makortel, @rovere, @apsallid, @lecriste, @simonepigazzini, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3396f2/12932/summary.html
COMMIT: fed83f0
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-02-16-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/32925/12932/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 9205 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2750846
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 101407
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 94
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2649323
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 36 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 156 log files, 37 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files

[cvuosalo]

Comparison tests seem to show many unexpected differences in Phase 2 workflows.

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32925/21163

• This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Geometry/HGCalCommonData/src/HGCalDDDConstants.cc modified in PR(s): Heterogeneous HGCAL RecHit Calibration #32683

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #32925 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @srimanob, @kpedro88 can you please check and sign again.

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3396f2/12940/summary.html
COMMIT: d1d0fa5
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-02-16-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/32925/12940/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

The workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 1094 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2750846
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3609
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 19
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2747196
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -45.703 KiB( 36 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.53 ): -44.531 KiB Hcal/DigiRunHarvesting
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.53 ): -1.172 KiB RPC/DCSInfo
• Checked 156 log files, 37 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files

[cvuosalo]

+1

[civanch]

+1

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[qliphy]

+1