-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MTD validation: update standalone test configuration to scenario D76, use up-to-date fragments #33649
Conversation
…ragments and options
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33649/22528
|
A new Pull Request was created by @fabiocos (Fabio Cossutti) for master. It involves the following packages: Validation/MtdValidation @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test merely formal, the updated cfg is not probed by PR test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-719eec/14917/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Update of the standalone test configuration in
Validation/MtdValidation/test
to use geometry scenario D76, the more modern definition of geometry fragments, and newly introduced flags for expert checks.PR validation:
The cfg correctly runs on the output of wf 34634.0 and provides the desired output.