-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run3-gex74X Try to resolve the overlap in PPS #33760
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33760/22710
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
@cmsbuild Please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33760/22711
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Geometry @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @srimanob, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ae2b76/15146/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
<rSolid name="Bottom_Wall_nocut"/> | ||
<rSolid name="Window_Cut"/> | ||
<Translation x="0*mm" y="0*mm" z="[bottom_wall_thickness]/2-[cut_depth]/2"/> | ||
</SubtractionSolid> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indentation is wrong here.
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ | |||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you want to change this file? I did a diff and found no significant changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was working with 2 xml files and changed them several times. At the end I was happy by changing only 1 file. Let me delete the unchanged file and redo the cfi's
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ae2b76/15178/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
Could you please clarify the naming convention you are using, i.e 2018 in "CTPPS_Diamond_2018" with "2021". I understand that 2021 is used to represent Run-3. Why don't we start to make CTPPS_Diamond_2021?
|
Likely Phat is right in general but situation is even more complicate. If one looks into https://cmssdt.cern.ch/lxr/source/Geometry/VeryForwardData/data/ there are many directories and single files with some chaos in names. One concern: CTPPS is an obsolete historical name, which do not corresponds to real detector. Another concern: should we use sub-directories or take plane files? There was an agreement to reduce number "CTPPS" inside file names in new files and read it out where possible. Of course we cannot change "CTPPS_Diamond_2018" or "CTPPS_Diamond_2017", because it is not easy to find out all places where these files are used. Now question: what files from this complex structure are used in Extended2021 geometry for SIM and for RECO? What is an optimal solution in a long time? The new file may be moved inside 2021 directory, would it be the most optimal solution for today? |
This is probably where the PPS RECO people can be ping'ed! |
@civanch we are considering a reordering in this directory while implementing the real new geometry for run3 detectors. |
I think this PR should be merged as is. The re-organization of file names is a separate issue. It's important to get the overlaps fixed now. |
Yes. I agree. Please go on with this fix. |
@srimanob , would you agree that directory structure will be sort out in the following PRs? |
+Upgrade This PR is to fix overlap in PPS. As agreed in the PR discussion, this PR fix is merged first. Then we expect the re-organization of filenames, directories in the new Run-3 geometry. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Run3-gex74Y Backport #33760 to remove overlap in PPS
PR description:
Try to resolve the overlap in PPS. It changes positions of some of the volumes.
PR validation:
Tested with overlap check tools
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Nothing special