Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-alca202X Add the treemaker for the new AlCaReco of HcalHBHEMuon #35383

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 25, 2021

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Add the treemaker for the new AlCaReco of HcalHBHEMuon

PR validation:

Tested by running the new and old tree makers on corresponding AlCa o/p files

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35383/25474

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35383/25475

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Calibration/HcalAlCaRecoProducers (alca)
  • Calibration/HcalCalibAlgos (alca)

@yuanchao, @malbouis, @cmsbuild, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 23, 2021

Hi @bsunanda I think these config files should be under test, only the _cfi and _cff files should be under python. Otherwise I have no comments, everything looks good to me

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f748d7/18860/summary.html
COMMIT: 0cf5d10
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-23-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/35383/18860/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3211080
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211058
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 39 files compared)
  • Checked 169 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tvami the _cfi _cff are in the directory python while the cfg's are in test/python. These scripts are not compiled using "scram b" command. This is natural to create a subdirectory under test and put the cfg's there. We maintain this in a number of packages where we keep large number of cfg's. It is good that all test cfg's are kept separate from other test codes. If you are worried of the name "test/python" we can rename it as "test/cfgs" - but the first name is certainly more preferable.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 23, 2021

Ahhh it slipped my attention that it was indeed under /test, but there is a subdirectory called python there. I guess that should be fine, although it's a bit misleading. Let's see what the release managers say about this structure @perrotta @qliphy

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 24, 2021

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • I see no issues in using a \python subdirectory under \test

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 2395bb1 into cms-sw:master Sep 25, 2021

#include "DataFormats/HcalCalibObjects/interface/HcalHBHEMuonVariables.h"

#define EDM_ML_DEBUG
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This macro should not be defined by default.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Oct 29, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants