[DQM] Fix DTChamberEfficiencyTest esConsumes to use proper Transition

[battibass]

PR description:

This is a trivial fix to the DTChamberEfficiencyTest module, to specify the proper transition to esConsumes.
The problem was spot in the deployment the DT Prompt Offline Analysis (POA) programs used to process CRAFT data.

PR validation:

The DT POA works as expected after the fix was deployed. As the module does not run in central workflows, I simply tested that a few runTheMatrix.py get to completion after the fix.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35851/26225

• This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @battibass (Carlo Battilana) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• DQM/DTMonitorClient (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[jfernan2]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e71921/19964/summary.html
COMMIT: d59aea0
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-26-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35851/19964/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 41
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2797338
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2797316
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 40 files compared)
• Checked 173 log files, 37 edm output root files, 41 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[jfernan2]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1

• Fix for a locally used monitor module