-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Style changes in RecoTracker/DeDx
#37231
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37231/28830
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @ssekmen, @yuanchao, @lveldere, @sbein, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @missirol, @clacaputo, @Martin-Grunewald, @slava77, @jpata, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3d6633/23084/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Indeed, please code a customisation function in |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37231/28841
|
Pull request #37231 was updated. @malbouis, @ssekmen, @yuanchao, @lveldere, @sbein, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @missirol, @clacaputo, @Martin-Grunewald, @slava77, @jpata, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again. |
9b2e8c5
to
6e42870
Compare
Co-authored-by: Marco Musich <marco.musich@cern.ch>
I will squash the commits, but let's see first if @cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 has any comments or not |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37231/28865
|
Pull request #37231 was updated. @malbouis, @ssekmen, @yuanchao, @lveldere, @sbein, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @missirol, @clacaputo, @Martin-Grunewald, @slava77, @jpata, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3d6633/23149/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 1001.0, 1000.0, 136.88811, 136.874, 136.8311, 136.793, 136.7611, 136.731, 4.22 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+reconstruction
|
+1 |
Hi @sbein the fast-sim changes are trivial, can you please sign it? |
merge |
merge |
PR description:
I was going to do some development in
RecoTracker/DeDx
but noticed that many thing dont comply with the coding ruleshttps://cms-sw.github.io/cms_coding_rules.html
So this PR does several style changes in that package regarding the following rules:
Besides this,
Reccord
)Changes are just cosmetics, so no changes in the tests are expected.
After this merges, I have a follow-up with some real changes included.
PR validation:
scram b runtests
runs fine (except for the case when I have file opening errors)if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A