-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update monopole autoskim #37655
Update monopole autoskim #37655
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37655/29457
|
A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob (Phat Srimanobhas) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @kskovpen, @jordan-martins can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37655/29566
|
Pull request #37655 was updated. @cmsbuild, @bbilin, @kskovpen, @jordan-martins can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
Thanks @srimanob |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6b4445/24307/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Ping @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 |
+pdmv |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6b4445/24703/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
hi @srimanob (writing with my ORM hat this week), |
Hi @tvami Here are clarifications:
|
Thanks Phat, I'll then remove the monopole skim from the MET in the T0 config |
PR description:
This main goal for this PR is to update autoSkim for monopole analysis. However, the structure of autoSkim has been updated following the discussion in #37656
autoSkimRunII
is made (clone of currentautoSkim
).PR validation:
None. No change is expected for the PR test since monopole skim will not change anything in DQM histograms.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
No need of backport.