Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[12_4_X] Add run3 PPS TDC and SAMPIC relvals #38978

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2022

Conversation

ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisMisan ChrisMisan commented Aug 5, 2022

PR description:

PR adds relvals for the TDC and SAMPIC Run3 calibrations.

PR validation:

wfs 1041,1043,1044

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

backport of #38893

@ChrisMisan ChrisMisan changed the title Add run3 PPS TDC and SAMPIC relvals [12_4_X] Add run3 PPS TDC and SAMPIC relvals Aug 5, 2022
@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the CMSSW_12_4_X milestone Aug 5, 2022
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @ChrisMisan (Christopher) for CMSSW_12_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • CalibPPS/TimingCalibration (alca)
  • CondFormats/PPSObjects (alca)
  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @saumyaphor4252, @kskovpen, @tvami, @ChrisMisan, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@slomeo, @makortel, @fabferro, @tocheng, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @kpedro88, @grzanka, @trtomei, @mmusich, @beaucero, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

type ctpps

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the ctpps label Aug 5, 2022
@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

ChrisMisan commented Aug 5, 2022

urgent

- this backport is needed for datataking

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the urgent label Aug 5, 2022
@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 5, 2022

hi @ChrisMisan please decouple the RelVal changes from the CalibPPS/TimingCalibration/plugins/PPSDiamondSampicTimingCalibrationPCLHarvester.cc and make this not urgent I'll make a PR that deals with the PPSDiamondSampicTimingCalibrationPCLHarvester.cc changes and a bit more that's needed for this to work at the T0 (with what's in here, it's not going to work)

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 5, 2022

@cmsbuild , please abort

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2022

Pull request #38978 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @saumyaphor4252, @kskovpen, @tvami, @ChrisMisan, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again.

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

PR was updated according to the suggestion #38978 (comment)

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

  • workflows=1041, 1043, 1044

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 5, 2022

Sorry @ChrisMisan I think we also need to decouple CondFormats/PPSObjects/src/PPSTimingCalibration.cc

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 5, 2022

@cmsbuild , please abort

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 6, 2022

@cmsbuild , please test with #38982

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-78cb09/26674/summary.html
COMMIT: 24b6c02
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-08-06-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38978/26674/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-78cb09/1041.0_RunExpressPhy2017F+RunExpressPhy2017F+TIER0EXPPPSCAL+ALCASPLITPPSCAL+ALCAHARVDPPSCAL
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-78cb09/1043.0_RunRawPPS2022B+RunRawPPS2022B+TIER0EXPPPSCALRUN3+ALCASPLITPPSCALSAMPIC+ALCAHARVDPPSCALSAMPIC
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-78cb09/1044.0_RunRawPPS2022B+RunRawPPS2022B+TIER0EXPPPSCALRUN3+ALCASPLITPPSCALRUN3+ALCAHARVDPPSCALRUN3

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3677242
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3677218
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

Just to refresh the test after almost a week.

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisMisan @tvami
Is this PR ready to go from your side? Just to refresh the test, then I will sign.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Aug 12, 2022

@ChrisMisan @tvami Is this PR ready to go from your side? Just to refresh the test, then I will sign.

Yes, it's all good! Thanks for signing!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-78cb09/26782/summary.html
COMMIT: 24b6c02
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-08-12-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38978/26782/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-78cb09/1041.0_RunExpressPhy2017F+RunExpressPhy2017F+TIER0EXPPPSCAL+ALCASPLITPPSCAL+ALCAHARVDPPSCAL
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-78cb09/1043.0_RunRawPPS2022B+RunRawPPS2022B+TIER0EXPPPSCALRUN3+ALCASPLITPPSCALSAMPIC+ALCAHARVDPPSCALSAMPIC
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-78cb09/1044.0_RunRawPPS2022B+RunRawPPS2022B+TIER0EXPPPSCALRUN3+ALCASPLITPPSCALRUN3+ALCAHARVDPPSCALRUN3

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 12 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3677242
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3677200
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

New added workflows run fine.

@bbilin
Copy link
Contributor

bbilin commented Aug 12, 2022

+pdmv

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Aug 12, 2022

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 309c07e into cms-sw:CMSSW_12_4_X Aug 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants