Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-sim126 Try to adress complaints from static analyser for SimG4CMS/Calo #39209

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2022

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Try to avoid complaints from static analyser for SimG4CMS/Calo

PR validation:

Use the runTheMatrix test workflows

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39209/31826

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • SimG4CMS/Calo (simulation)

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@felicepantaleo, @rovere, @thomreis, @simonepigazzini, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6a337b/27113/summary.html
COMMIT: 060fd65
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-08-25-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39209/27113/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3695708
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 21
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3695664
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Aug 26, 2022

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

Curiously enough, this causes differences in the efficiencies for Phase2 muons
I'll try to understand why, but not earlier than next week...

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

I do not think that the Phase 2 L1T muons discrepancies have anything to do with this PR. They also show in other PRs, like e.g. #39193 .

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

I do not think that the Phase 2 L1T muons discrepancies have anything to do with this PR. They also show in other PRs, like e.g. #39193 .

@thomreis thank you for pointing it out.
It could be another one of the unwanted features added by the merging of #38442...
Attn. @cms-sw/l1-l2

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 29ba338 into cms-sw:master Aug 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants