Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[12_4_X] Bug fix in EMTF GEM and RPC unpacker blocks #39462

Merged

Conversation

eyigitba
Copy link
Contributor

@eyigitba eyigitba commented Sep 20, 2022

PR description:

This is the backport of #39460

This PR fixes a bug that was mentioned in #39456

The bug was introduced in #39389

It was a stupid mistake on my part that somehow went in. The index for the for loop does not match the if/else statements, hence causing an empty GEM/RPC TP to be created which then causes the crash when we try to create detID.

This should be backported to 12_4_X and 12_5_X to fix the same ug in those releases.

PR validation:

Tested with running the unpacker on the data files mentioned in #39456. Unpacker runs and assigns the correct values to GEM/RPC TPs.

File used: /eos/cms/store/t0streamer/Data/Express/000/359/045/run359045_ls0144_streamExpress_StorageManager.dat

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

This is the backport of #39460

@eyigitba
Copy link
Contributor Author

type bugfix

@eyigitba
Copy link
Contributor Author

urgent

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 20, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @eyigitba for CMSSW_12_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • EventFilter/L1TRawToDigi (l1)

@epalencia, @cmsbuild, @cecilecaillol, @rekovic can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@dinyar, @missirol, @thomreis, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #39460

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cecilecaillol
Copy link
Contributor

+l1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs after it passes the integration tests and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@syuvivida
Copy link
Contributor

syuvivida commented Sep 20, 2022

We tested this PR at the playback using the crashed run 359045 (reported by the DQM group earlier). The run finished OK without errors (25 LS tested). The test was done with CMSSW_12_4_9 + PR 39462.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f45d4f/27693/summary.html
COMMIT: 7ebacc9
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-09-20-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39462/27693/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3677402
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3677366
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit f6524df into cms-sw:CMSSW_12_4_X Sep 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants